Archive for April, 2011

IBM set to lose megadeal with AstraZeneca

April 20th, 2011

Global pharmaceuticals giant AstraZeneca, headquartered in London, is set to break off its IT outsourcing relationship with IBM, Computer Sweden and sister publication IT24 have learned.

The US$1.4 billion deal, signed in July 2007, was supposed to be a seven-year arrangement, but now IBM is to leave AstraZeneca in 12-15 months, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. AstraZeneca is said to have made its plans known on April 8, after several months of negotiations with IBM.

Under the agreement, IBM has provided IT infrastructure management services to AstraZeneca locations in 60 countries. The services include server and storage hosting, desktop management, network maintenance and management and help desk support for AstraZeneca’s 61,000 employees.

According to sources, AstraZeneca has been dissatisfied with IBM for a long time. Several IBM competitors are now gearing up to compete for the $200 million a year contract and replace IBM at the pharma giant.

“Of course we are interested, I think every player on the market is,” said a high-ranking executive at an IBM competitor, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The 2007 agreement was seen as a key win for IBM’s services unit, given that it came at a time when an increasing number of large pharmaceutical companies where tapping offshore vendors for their IT needs.

AstraZeneca was created in 1999 after a merger of Swedish pharmaceutical company Astra and the Zeneca Group of the U.K. It is the world’s seventh-largest pharmaceutical company measured by revenue, which was $33.3 billion in 2010.

IBM and AstraZeneca declined to comment.

“We never comment individual client relationships,” said a spokesman for IBM in Sweden.

“We won’t give any comments on this at this time,” a spokeswoman for AstraZeneca said.

Source:http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=35B6100B-1A64-67EA-E44C096FD5661EB1

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

IBM: Daniels’ email shows he had key role in welfare outsourcing deal, should face deposition

April 19th, 2011

Gov. Mitch Daniels had such a keen interest in the state’s $1.37 billion contract with IBM Corp. to automate welfare intake in Indiana that he asked an aide if an unexpectedly high number of telephone calls to a call center was a ploy by a state employees union, an IBM attorney said Monday.

IBM wants to depose Daniels soon because it’s concerned he will announce he’s running for president and would be too busy on the campaign trail to give a deposition, said IBM attorney Steven McCormick, who also wants to depose Daniels’ chief of staff.

Daniels has said he won’t decide on a White House run until after the General Assembly adjourns later this month.

“He made the key decisions all the way,” McCormick said. “We’re concerned that any delay will be met with, ‘Well, now it’s too late.’”

However, Peter Rusthoven, an attorney for the state, said a state law exempts certain high-level state officials including the governor, from court subpoenas and that other current and former state officials who are expected to testify will provide the same information Daniels and chief of staff Earl Goode were privy to.

Marion Superior Court Judge David Dreyer told the attorneys he expected to rule on the depositions within two weeks.

The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration is suing IBM for $437 million, the money it paid the Armonk, N.Y.-based technology giant to introduce call centers, document imaging and other automation to applications for food stamps, Medicaid and other public assistance programs before Daniels fired IBM for breach of contract in October 2009.

IBM wants the state to pay more than $50 million in deferred payments and equipment costs.

The oral arguments lasting more than two hours revealed the level of Daniels’ involvement in one of the biggest outsourcing contracts in state history. McCormick displayed on the IBM attorney’s table four thick binders containing what he said were 930 email messages to and from Daniels that the state has surrendered so far.

“They’re here to illustrate the cradle to grave, preconception to afterlife” level of Daniels involvement in the deal, McCormick said.

Daniels received detailed reports on the number of calls welfare clients made to a call center created with IBM technology, and after one report showed an unusually large number of calls, he asked an aide if it was a union ploy, McCormick said. McCormick didn’t identify the union, but a state employees union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, vociferously opposed the outsourcing deal.

Another e-mail message instructed recipients “the governor was to be familiarized with all aspects of modernization,” McCormick said, using the term the state used for the IBM project.

Source:http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/market_news/article.jsp?content=D9MMNN980

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

‘IT, ITES-BPO industry upbeat on 2011 outlook’

April 19th, 2011

After an initial setback due to the global recession, the Indian information technology (IT) and information technology-enabled services-business process outsourcing (ITES-BPO) industry is back on the high-growth path, according to the findings of a survey of SMEs in the sector, conducted by IndiaMART Knowledge Services (IKS).

The outlook for the future is also positive, as almost half of the respondents (48 per cent) expect more than 20 per cent growth in 2011. While the same proportion is hopeful of achieving growth of up to 20 per cent, only four per cent expect a decline in sales.

Fifty-six per cent of the respondents reported that the market had picked up in 2010 when compared to 2009. While 24 per cent found no change, 20 per cent reported a decline. Some 24 per cent said that customer sentiment had improved beyond expectations in 2010, while 44 per cent reported average improvement and 32 per cent reported that consumer sentiment remained negative.

A majority of the respondents (52 per cent) reported that sales increased by 20 per cent during 2010, while 36 per cent reported an increase in sales of more than 20 per cent; only 12 per cent witnessed negative growth in sales.

There was a similar trend in exports. A majority of those surveyed (48 per cent) witnessed an increase in export demand by 20 per cent in 2010 as against 2009, and 36 per cent saw an increase of more than 20 per cent. The remainder (16 per cent) experienced a decline in export demand.

Source:http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/it-ites-bpo-industry-upbeat2011-outlook/432656/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Ayala IT unit acquires BPO company in US

April 19th, 2011

A business process outsourcing firm backed by the Ayala group has acquired IQ BackOffice LLC based in Los Angeles, California, which provides backroom finance and accounting services to mid-sized companies in the United States.

Ayala Corp. disclosed to the Philippine Stock Exchange on Monday that HRMall Inc., a BPO firm which provides IT-enabled human resource services out of Manila, had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire IQ BackOffice. The combined value of the two companies is estimated at $15 million.

HR Mall is one of the investing companies of the Ayalas Group’s BPO holding firm LiveIt Investments Ltd. Its new acquisition, IQ BackOffice, delivers high quality, software-enabled and real-time finance and accounting BPO services to US companies.

Clients of IQ BackOffice, which employs over 200 people in the United States and India, are US firms with annual revenues of $50 million to $1 billion. But some of its clients generate revenue of up to $10 billion.

It has more than 30 public and private company clients, including restaurants, manufacturers and distributors, hotels, entertainment establishments, property and financial firms.

The management team of IQ BackOffice, including its founder and chief executive officer David Schnitt, will get a 17.5-percent ownership interest in HRMall as part of the deal.

Schnitt, who had co-founded Nasdaq-listed professional services firm Resources Global Professionals before he put up IQ BackOffice, will be appointed CEO of HRMall.

LiveIt will own the balance of 82.5 percent of HRMall and has vowed to support a strategy to fast-track growth in existing markets in the United States and Asia.

With this deal, HRMall will be in a better position to help enterprises slash costs by 30 to 50 percent a year.

All stockholders of HRMall and IQ BackOffice have approved and signed the sale and purchase documents. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to be sealed by April 30.

The company will operate as HRMall in Asia and IQ BackOffice in the United States. It will employ a total of over 300 workers out of centers in Manila, Chennai, Mumbai and Los Angeles.

Source:http://business.inquirer.net/money/topstories/view/20110418-331939/Ayala-IT-unit-acquires-BPO-company-in-US

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Outsourcing Mobile App Development

April 19th, 2011

My IT Business Edge colleague Susan Hall on Friday wrote about how a developer shortage could mean companies won’t be able to create mobile applications as quickly as they’d like. She noted that the scarcity is forcing companies to boost wages, retrain software engineers, outsource work to third-party developers and set up offshore development labs to meet demand.

While this issue is impacting companies of all sizes, it’s likely to be an especially big deal for small and mid-size companies, few of which can afford the kinds of salaries Susan mentions in her post, $90,000 a year and up.

Gil Seabra, director of business development for Actminds, a provider of development and management services, said that companies like his, which employs developers in Brazil, can help SMBs cost effectively roll out mobile applications. In addition to the labor shortage that is driving up demand and salaries for mobile developers, Seabra said many mobile projects are “not linear demands.”

In other words, unlike some business applications, many customer-facing mobile apps require little major development work once they are complete. So it may not make sense to build an internal staff with specialized mobile skills, Seabra said. (Of course, companies may become more interested in beefing up internal mobile skills, as they also add more mobile apps used by their own employees, a trend Seabra said is growing.)

Even companies that intend to build their own mobile staffs can attain a quicker ROI from working with vendors like Actminds as they bring their employees up to speed. Working with a wide variety of clients gives vendors experience with “usability, look and feel and specific functionalities,” Seabra said.

Like other Brazilian service providers, Actminds touts its cultural compatibility with Western companies. Unlike Indian services providers, which must contend with a time difference of 10 hours or more with their U.S. clients, Brazil is three hours behind Greenwich Mean Time. This facilitates easy communication with clients, which Seabra said is especially important as Actminds uses Agile development methodologies for 95 percent of its projects.

Source:http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/all/outsourcing-mobile-app-development/?cs=46552

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

BPOs looking to buy legal outsourcers

April 19th, 2011

Pangea3, a legal process outsourcing (LPO) firm, is seeing an increased range of activity post its acquisition by the $13 billion news and business information company Thomson Reuters in November.

Sanjay Kamlani, co-founder and co-CEO of the firm, told DNA that the acquisition has brought a new level of credibility to the LPO stable, while adding in the same breath that top IT firms are looking at buying out Pangea3’s competitors. Excerpts from the interview:

Post the acquisition, what does the road ahead look like?
Thomson has brought a new level of credibility and a sense of stability. Prospective clients like top law firms were concerned about the viability of this industry. Now the acquisition has made it clear that this is a serious industry. Thomson has the largest set of legal technology and information databases. Many top-class databases like Complinet, Elite, FindLaw were used by lawyers without realising that they came from Thomson. Post the acquisition, our clients get a combination of our talent and expertise along with these database assets. This is causing clients to be far more interested in these joint solutions. We are seeing substantial increase in interest from new clients, our existing clients and Thomson’s clients.

Do you have Indian clients?
We don’t work for Indian clients as the Bar rules here don’t allow foreign firms to do legal work in India. We can support a law firm but can’t directly work for any client. In the US, the rules are clear. There in each state you have to be a lawyer from that state to practice there. Someone from Florida can’t go to New York and practice. But he can go and help a lawyer there. In India, the rules are not very clear on what foreign lawyers can exactly do.

Which area has seen maximum increase in work post the buy?
Work related to regulatory compliance has increased tremendously. This is a very large area for Thomson and we are seeing a large influx of activity.

So, what is the rate you expect to grow at?
Prior to the buy, we grew by 100% annually, both in terms of revenues and headcount and the same rate would continue henceforth.

Was acquisition always on cards?
We were VC funded (Glemrock Group and Sequoia Capital were investors). So we expected exit from investors at some point in time, and we had to either get acquired or come up with an IPO. We were never built to stay independent. Thomson is No.1 globally in legal industries and we saw a strategic fit. The timing of this buyout was apt. It proved to be good for all stakeholders like our employees, clients and investors. Many buys don’t soothe all three stakeholders. But this left our employees, clients and investors feeling 100% satisfied, as it provided employees with career growth, and investors with a rewarding level of returns.

You see more acquisitions in the LPO space?
Yes of course. I have heard rumours that all the top Indian IT/BPO players are looking at buying our competitors.

Which IT players?
All the top ones. Also the top BPOs. They view LPO as opportunities to go up the value chain and add a new vertical. Also, LPOs bring better margins. We fetch margins which range between 15% and 30%.

How is the LPO space evolving?
The business is becoming global. In India, often lawyers don’t usually go overseas, unlike in the IT space. But we are providing overseas opportunities of 3-12 months to the UK, US, Japan, EU, Switzerland to our employees. And post the buy, due to the global reach of Thomson, our lawyers get more time abroad. They can visit clients abroad and teach lawyers there about our business practices and new ways of doing business. LPOs are taking parts of law which are not specific to a particular geography and are developing expertise which transcends geographies.

Source:http://www.dnaindia.com/money/interview_bpos-looking-to-buy-legal-outsourcers_1533449

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Can agencies pay enough to attract top IT talent?

April 19th, 2011

In the various debates about outsourcing, insourcing and federal pay, one issue almost always comes up: The tough competition for IT talent.

Although federal agencies have the advantage of doing some very cool projects, they still have a difficult time competing for up-and-coming IT workers, many readers say. The problem is that techies working in hot fields – developing enterprise smartphone apps, for example — demand pay and perks outside the range of the General Schedule system.

“Our agency’s IT department is having to create non-supervisory 14s to hire system administrators because we can’t compete with private industry in pay,” wrote an FCW reader who called himself or herself Fed Up. “In three years, we’d probably only be able to hire a system admin only if we open the position as an SES position.”

Those young Turks are more likely to end up working for a software vendor or systems integrator already working in the sweet spot of the IT industry, rather than a federal agency, the theory goes.

That was the case of an information security expert who had recently left the Defense Department after just two years on the job. At first, the reader was willing to accept the fact that former colleagues in the private sector were making a lot more money. But then rumors of a pay freeze began and that was too much.

“I really want to serve (I have 15 years of previous state and local government experience on top of my private sector experience), but I refuse to be a punching bag for the politicians while my family suffers,” IT Sec wrote. “Take note, new feds: Your elected officials don’t care about you. If you can do better for yourself on the outside, go for it. I’m happy I did.”

If agencies cannot attract top talent, how does that affect their insourcing/outsourcing strategies? Should agencies simply cede the competition and spend more money on contractors any time new technology is involved? Or is that giving up too much control?

What do you think?

Source:http://fcw.com/blogs/insider/2011/04/fcw-challenge-federal-agencies-it-contractors.aspx

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes