Archive for October, 2011

Clouds Vs. Outsourcing: The Next Battleground

October 21st, 2011

IBM, HP, and other established vendors entering cloud computing are often already outsourcing partners to the firms that are now frequently looking for an infrastructure service provider. But that doesn’t mean they have an inside track on the business. They do not.
Established vendors are going to face stiff competition for outsourcing business from the new infrastructure providers: Amazon, Rackspace, and others, according to a report by Pricewaterhouse Coopers.

“Service providers in the IT outsourcing space have, after all, profited handsomely by taking on their customers’ highly complex, one-off collections of IT assets and finding ways to manage them more efficiently than their customers are able to,” states the Pricewaterhouse report.

“But the essence of cloud computing is a move towards highly standardized racks of commodity servers,” with software that manages the racks and allows customers to run applications on them through self-service. “Where’s the IT outsourcing opportunity in that?” said the report, sponsored by Mike Pearl, partner and cloud computing leader at PriceWaterhouse.

“What we see with the large technology providers with a legacy business model is that they have the expense of legacy architecture elements built into that model,” said Pearl in an interview. Traditional outsourcing suppliers, such as IBM and HP, are often able to operate Sun Sparc, IBM Power, IBM AIX, and mainframe systems and HP-UX systems as well as x86 commodity systems.

Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) providers don’t invest in the skills to do that. They concentrate on x86 systems only and build them to operate in a highly automated fashion. As a result, they can charge for use by the hour and offer highly competitive rates to traditional outsourcing.

Although Amazon Web Services is the market leader in IaaS, cloud options for enterprises are about to rapidly expand, Pearl predicted.

In short, IT outsourcing is being disrupted by IaaS from cloud providers. Analysis of Pricewaterhouse’s recent Future of IT Outsourcing and Cloud Computing survey of 489 firms indicates that a majority will soon favor the pureplay infrastructure service providers.

The survey indicated 77% of firms have started planning or have plans for some form of cloud computing and 64% said the cloud will be the best way to manage IT infrastructure three years from now. Asked who would be the best provider of that infrastructure three years from now, 55% said service providers who specialize in private cloud offerings; 39% said traditional outsourcing companies.

Even the 152 companies that are currently engaged with outsourcing partners said something similar. When they were asked who would make the best future infrastructure partner, 52% said “new cloud-focused providers would be best,” the report said.

The survey respondents indicated they thought the cloud-only service providers would be able to provide the managed infrastructure of an outsourcer, while leaving responsibility for running workloads in the hands of the business customer, with an expected savings as a result, the report said.

Pearl said firms turning to IaaS will need to learn the services providers’ methods of operation and take responsibility for the ongoing operation of their workloads. IaaS suppliers’ ability to give end users the ability to self-provision a server and launch a workload has come about quickly. In a similar vein, the “tools and automation of procedures for ongoing operations is evolving at an equally rapid pace,” Pearl said. In the future, if you tell IaaS to run a certain set of application services at 2 p.m. Thursday, you’ll turn your back on them and know they’ll be running at the appropriate time, unless you receive a notice that they have stalled.

Private cloud services may be delivered from both on-premises or in the public cloud. When delivered from the public cloud, private cloud services often include: hardware isolation from other customers instead of using shared, multitenant servers; encrypted communications over a VLAN or secure line; and secure data handling procedures.

Amazon, Rackspace, GoGrid, Verizon/Terremark, AT&T, Savvis/CenturyLink, and other IaaS providers offer such “private” cloud services. Fujitsu and Dell recently joined the ranks of IaaS providers as well.

Rackspace and Amazon have been audited and certified capable of delivering Payment Card Industry compliant services for executing credit card transactions, a type of internal enterprise or “private cloud” operation.

Source:http://www.informationweek.com/news/cloud-computing/infrastructure/231901246

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

IT outsourcing spend up on last year already

October 21st, 2011

The first nine months of the year saw the retail, telecommunications, manufacturing and media sectors increase their spending on IT outsourcing.

Figures published by the information service TPI show that outsourcing investment in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (Emea) has already exceeded levels set in the same time last year.

However, the financial services industry, which was the biggest outsourcing spender in 2010, has reduced its layout by 48 per cent, down some 1.1 billion euros in the first quarter of the year.

But the overall picture is buoyed by the fact that the manufacturing and retail sectors have both spent more on outsourcing their IT needs in the first three quarters of 2011 then they did in the whole of last year.

Manufacturing spend has risen by 0.1 billion euros, while retail has seen a further 0.6 billion euros in investment.

Martyn Hart, chairman at the National Outsourcing Association, said that retailers such as Tesco, Homebase, Poundland and Argos have all spent considerable amounts of money in outsourcing in the past 12 months.

He believes this proves the sector’s ongoing commitment to improving customer experience as well as getting the best out of their warehouse operations.

Mr Hart added: “Outsourcing in the Emea retail sector has risen 600 per cent on last quarter, and 75 per cent year on year. This is due to major retail players seeking competitive advantage by adopting high-tech IT solutions and infrastructure upgrades. They are turning to outsourcing providers as a low risk route to superior technology.”

The UK is the largest and most advanced IT outsourcing market in Europe and grew by 36 per cent in the five years up to the start of 2010.

A recent report by Connect2Law stated that 77.3 per cent of UK legal firms surveyed saw the benefit of hosting their IT services off site.

Source:http://www.ihotdesk.com/article/800770773/IT-outsourcing-spend-up-on-last-year-already

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Yantai to focus on animation and software outsourcing

October 21st, 2011

The city of Yantai, located on the northern coast of the Shandong province, has made great progress in its animation and software outsourcing, owing to its geological proximity to Japan and the ROK, who are themselves software powerhouses.

Yantai now has more than 200 businesses in the software industry, about 60 of which provide outsourcing services in digital information technologies, cartoons and video games. They generated more than $60 million worth of offshore business last year, according to the city’s commerce bureau.

Yantai plans to spend at least 30 billion yuan ($4.6 billion) on a 1,110-hectare outsourcing park to pull in 80,000 skilled workers from animation and software sectors.

Yantai has spent 1 billion yuan on industrial parks for the software and animation development with a focus on outsourcing.

One of these parks, the Yantai Animation Park, is considered a national animation base by the General Administration of Press and Publication. The Shandong Provincial Culture Bureau has declared it a culture industry demonstration base. Six out of its 40 animation companies now provide overseas outsourcing services.

Source:http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/m/shandong/e/2011-10/21/content_13943800.htm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

ICG Commerce, procurement outsourcing Kings of Prussia

October 21st, 2011

On our recent trip to the US, we took the opportunity to call in on ICG Commerce and meet Kristen Knouft, their Marketing VP, over a sandwich (and how do the Americans get quite so much meat into a single sandwich)?

My first surprise was in getting a sense of how big the organisation is – over 700 people now. And while by no means all their staff are based near Philadelphia, in King Of Prussia, (also home to the biggest shopping mall in North America and the most complicated road junction I’ve ever navigated…). It’s an impressive facility, and the number of people actually working there reflects the way they structure their offering to clients. More about that later.

They’re clearly an organisation that has been around long enough now to understand pretty well what works and what doesn’t in procurement outsourcing. Interestingly, there was a high degree of commonality between their comments and those made by buyingTeam when we last spoke. For instance, both organisations place much store in “customer intimacy”, and are not too keen on the “outsourcing” word, preferring more collaborative sounding epithets these days.

ICG started out more than 10 years ago with a focus on promoting aggregation and using technology to drive value for clients. They had their own e-marketplace, and were often rewarded by transaction fees and share of savings mechanisms.

But over the years, they have shifted to a strategy that is based much more on having deep expertise particularly around indirect spend categories – aggregation and technology are still important, but are not so much at the heart of their proposition. Some clients use them for all indirects; others pick and choose particular categories; logistics or IT perhaps. “We aggregate information, market intelligence and capability to benefit our clients” as Knouft put it. “Often these are spend areas where clients can’t – or don’t want to afford the time, money or effort to develop the expertise themselves”.

ICG structure their people into a number of teams based on different functional areas. Some focus on sourcing exercises; some are deep category experts; and others work on client engagement, compliance and post contract management. That means that some will be on client site pretty much permanently; some when necessary; and some spend most of their time in King of Prussia (the deepest category researchers perhaps). It’s an interesting model, based as we said earlier on years of pragmatic experience, and one that certainly feels more appropriate than the pure “labour arbitrage” models we used to see from some providers in the ealry days of procurement outsourcing.

The fee model is now generally a straight annual fee, but often with milestones and targets linked to some of the reward. But (and again, this chimes with others such as buyingTeam), ICG have found that a pure gainshare model can encourage the wrong behaviours – from both parties!

We’ll have more in Part 2 shortly, and look at an example of where that category expertise can really add value to a customer.

Source:http://spendmatters.co.uk/icg-commerce-outsouricng-kings-prussia/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Outsourcing fatigue: Why CIOs have gone from fans to fed up

October 21st, 2011

Outsourcing has been a staple of corporate strategy for years, but CIOs may be getting weary of it – and wary of its consequences, says silicon.com editor Steve Ranger.

Outsourcing has long been a standard component of business strategy, a popular choice for firms keen to get rid of tech infrastructure that provides little competitive advantage.

The idea is that outsourcers – with their scale and greater experience – can deliver IT as a service more efficiently and cheaply than their customers ever could through having their own IT staff. Add in offshore support and the cost savings really start to pile up, so the argument goes.

It’s persuasive and the idea of getting someone to take away the complications of owning and running IT, and replacing it with a predictable cost for a service, has been highly attractive to boards – and CIOs – for years.

A significant proportion of outsourcing has been about two things: cutting costs, and offloading a problem – for example, an IT department loaded with expensive staff serving a creaky, ageing tech infrastructure.

It’s rarely about innovation. I’ve seen very few companies bragging about how their IT outsourcing strategy has cost more than doing it inhouse, and still being happy with the additional cost because it’s boosted their capacity for innovation. But perhaps I just missed that case study.

And maybe it’s because the narrow focus of outsourcing has been on cutting costs and offloading problems that I’ve been picking up on a lot of outsourcing fatigue among the CIOs I’ve been talking to.

Perhaps this is from a small sample, but I hear CIOs and IT directors expressing doubts about the wisdom of outsourcing, on a number of levels.

Now, such reservations aren’t new in themselves but rarely have I heard so many CIOs and IT directors sounding so uncomfortable about such a key element of business strategy.

First, they complain that it doesn’t always work. As soon as you announce outsourcing plans, you lose your best people, who don’t want to stick around for all the pain and uncertainty of the restructuring. And when the outsourcing deal is done, outsourced workers and their new managers are far less loyal and no longer willing to go that extra mile for your business. Those attitudes make IT innovation far harder.

Secondly, at a more personal level these CIOs argue that outsourcing often means accepting IT is no longer an enabler – and that the board would prefer to get rid of it rather than make it relevant. For these CIOs it’s a defeat because instead of being a source of opportunity, IT has become a problem to be fixed. And these are people who enjoy building teams, not breaking them up.

Thirdly, there is an increasing worry about what outsourcing – and particularly offshoring – means for the longer term health of the UK IT industry and the country in general.

That’s because while outsourcing and offshoring may make sense for an individual organisation in cutting overall costs and a big chunk of capex too, when replicated across a country the effect on skills and employment can be quite different.

Several CIOs pointed to increasing youth unemployment, and worry how much their own actions in offshoring entry-level jobs are contributing to the problem. It’s an issue that’s worrying many. If UK businesses are giving the impression that IT is irrelevant and to be outsourced as cheaply as possible, why would anyone want to train for a job in IT?

I don’t see outsourcing going away. Not all IT has to be done inhouse, and there are compelling economies of scale especially in commodity services – cloud is eating up a chunk of the IT department, too. But it might be that more nuanced, smarter hybrid approaches to outsourcing will become more popular.

And yet it’s worth pointing out that, while these CIOs were depressed by outsourcing, they were still positive about the future of the IT organisation. Yes, it’s likely the IT department will get steadily smaller because what was once complex will become simple – automated into the cloud or outsourced.

But the idea of driving innovation through technology isn’t about to vanish – and having CIOs building brilliant teams of smart people who can come up with those ideas, and implement them, is going to be key.

Source:http://www.silicon.com/technology/it-services/2011/10/20/outsourcing-fatigue-why-cios-have-gone-from-fans-to-fed-up-39748106/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Getting the most from IT outsourcing providers

October 21st, 2011

IT outsourcing has become an attractive option for modern businesses. By turning over some portion of a data center infrastructure to a third-party provider, your business can potentially save capital expenditures, ease the burden on IT staff and focus on the products and services that your business was meant to offer in the first place. But outsourcing isn’t just a matter of signing a contract and flipping a switch. IT outsourcing providers are critical strategic vendors for a business; cultivating, assessing and refining that outsourcing relationship can make the difference between outsourcing success or failure. This tip offers some guidelines to help you review and maintain an outsourcing deal.

How do you like your IT outsourcing deal?
If you think about this simple question, you’ll realize that it’s not so simple after all. In reality, many businesses are unhappy with at least some elements or attributes of their existing outsourcing deal. After all, deals can be expensive, and the business benefits of that service may not be what you’d expected. Even at best, a service level is extremely difficult to measure with simple technical metrics. The contract may carry uncomfortable terms or restrictions, and relations between a business and provider can be easily strained by poor communication or contract management. And the outsourcing initiative must always be compatible with your business needs, which might not always be the case if the outsourcing was initiated haphazardly.

The goal is satisfaction. In the end, achieving satisfaction in IT outsourcing requires that both parties–the business and the provider–work together and benefit productively from their mutual relationship. Let’s look at some principle places where deals go bad and consider ways to address them.

Aligning IT outsourcing and business needs
Nothing is more detrimental to business than an ill-conceived plan, and outsourcing initiatives are often ill-conceived. In far too many cases, the decision to outsource is made as a knee-jerk reaction to some other event, such as unexpected budget concerns or undertaking a merger that the IT department isn’t prepared to handle. When outsourcing occurs without a solid business plan, there is no practical way for the outsourcing strategy to align with business needs–and it’s impossible for the provider to meet those needs. The net result is usually dissatisfaction with the provider and their services.

When you’re not satisfied with an IT outsourcing deal, don’t simply cancel the contract, assuming that the provider is falling short or failing to deliver on their service-level agreement (SLA). The first area to consider is your own outsourcing strategy. If you don’t have a clear plan that addresses long-term business interests, it is absolutely worth the effort to craft that strategy before making complaints to the provider or in-house IT staff. Business leaders and IT staff must start by assessing the capabilities of in-house IT services and think about the goals for IT in terms of services provided to the business. Based on any gap between that IT supply and demand, decide what you need from outsourcing providers.

Also take the time to consider risk in your strategy. Outsourcing IT services always carries an element of risk for the business–the more that is outsourced, the less direct control that the business has. Remember that outsourcing providers are in business too, and they will eventually merge, move, and make other changes to their organization that can potentially affect their service to you. As services are outsourced, a business must monitor the provider and maintain lines of communication that can help both sides understand growth and changing needs for both parties.

IT outsourcing cost and service levels
Services delivered through IT outsourcing can potentially cost more than providing the same IT services in-house, so it’s important to achieve the required level of service for the lowest possible price. When you’re not satisfied with an outsourcing deal, it’s worth considering both the service levels being provided, along with the pricing model currently in force.

An assessment of the provider’s service levels will depend on your outsourcing strategy (what the business needs) as well as some objective metrics of the services delivered. Linda Cohen, vice president and chief of research at Gartner Inc., said that traditional service contracts based solely on IT metrics are problematic, and end-to-end service levels simply don’t exist yet. Consequently, the measures that IT uses to determine “acceptable service” are not tied to business measures.

This disconnect makes it extremely difficult for a business to show the value in their outsourcing deals–traditional IT-based SLAs are a small start, but are largely ineffective for business planning. Instead, Cohen advises the use of broader operating-level agreements (OLAs) that tie IT metrics to key performance business indicators. When working with IT outsourcing providers, discuss how to measure their performance based on the broader effect on your business. In the end, such broader assessment of service can help a business refine the use of outsourcing and tailor the amount and type of outsourcing service accordingly.

This brings up the discussion of price. After assessing the service level, the business may discover that indeed they need a higher level of service from IT outsourcing providers. But the business may also discover that it has overinvested and is spending too much money on services that are not being fully utilized. It’s reasonably easy to make these types of adjustments with a provider on the fly to ensure that the business is receiving the right services. It is also important to consider the pricing models available from a provider. There are seven pricing models in the industry, according to Cohen. If the provider is only offering one or two options, it’s time to revisit the pricing structure with the provider.

IT outsourcing contracts and relationships
And then there are the mechanical and human aspects of the IT outsourcing relationship. The mechanical element is the contract itself–the binding legal agreement that ties a business and provider together. Contracts demand close attention from the business, which should involve review and input from senior IT staff up to the executive level (not to mention the requisite legal oversight). Ultimately, contract management is often considered to be a specialized skill, and a knowledgeable contract manager should be a resource for regular contract negotiations and discussions.

There is also a very human aspect to business relationships, especially when dealing with mission-critical business allies, such as IT outsourcing providers. A relationship manager (perhaps the same individual that is managing contracts) should make it their mission to keep the lines of communication open, foster and incent collaboration, and deal promptly with any areas of concern from either party. For example, if both parties know what to expect and where each other is headed, the chances for a mutually supportive and beneficial relationship are vastly improved.

Satisfaction with IT outsourcing providers
Successfully managing your outsourcing providers is a bit like gardening–it requires regular attention and cultivation, so it’s not a one-time effort. For example, the outsourcing deal that you make today may not make sense tomorrow. Your business is constantly changing, and its needs are changing as well. Competition for your outsourcing dollar may drive down prices, and creative new pricing models may prove more appealing for your business. New technologies may provide more delivery options. Cohen suggests an annual re-evaluation and update of your business’ outsourcing strategy. Similarly, keep your outsourcing deals short term. This combination of tactics will allow the business to remain agile and respond promptly to new outsourcing opportunities.

Source:http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/tip/Getting-the-most-from-IT-outsourcing-providers

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tap domestically for outsourcing work

October 21st, 2011

CHINESE companies engaged in services outsourcing should switch their focus to the domestic market for new opportunities and enhance their level of service capabilities to stay competitive as external demand shrinks, participants at the Global IT Outsourcing Summit said yesterday.

“A deteriorating economic outlook in the eurozone and the United States will soon lead to a cutback in new orders for Chinese services outsourcing companies,” said Norman Sze, managing partner of Deloitte Consulting China. “These companies should look for new opportunities and the Chinese market will be a good choice.”

Liu Ming, vice president of Shanghai-based Venus Software Co, said his company is now studying the potential of the Chinese market although most of the outsourcing services it provides still cater to overseas clients.

Outsourcing, which has grown into a trillion-dollar business over the past few years, subcontracts a certain process of production, such as designing, packaging, or information management, to a third-party company.

In China over 70 percent of services outsourcing are from companies based overseas and if the global economic outlook turns sour they will be extremely cost conscious.

Although Chinese firms still have a price competitive advantage they risk losing it.

“With the yuan continuing to appreciate we are gradually losing that strength,” Yan Tianfang, vice president at Shanghai Newtouch Software Co, said.

He said one solution is to be more competitive by investing funds in upgrading services offered and training personnel.

The two-day summit opened yesterday with the theme of “Smart City, New Opportunity.”

Source:http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/?id=485298&type=Business

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes