Posts Tagged ‘Anti-outsourcing’

NRN suggests solution to thwart anti-outsourcing cries

October 26th, 2010

When the Chinese came to India to set up power plants, the government rightly sought several guarantees. So, if some of our own markets seek similar guarantees from us, what is wrong? China earns more than $50 billion in exports, but have we heard any murmur about them in any of the markets they target,” Narayana Murthy asked the delegates.

For starters, they hire local talent to front-end their entry into a country. Indian industry too should be toeing their line in this regard, he said while underscoring that we should make every effort to ensure that we make ourselves less visible in the country we enter with our products and hire local talent to do the work instead.

Elaborating on why Indian outsourcing has raised of other countries in the recent past, the Infosys co-founder said the problem lies with our youngsters of the day who believe that career growth is achieved only through an H1B Visa and a Green Card and that life ultimately is made only if one settles in the United States.

“There are many ways an employee can serve the company and the senior management should inculcate this belief in their employees. Currently, they are scared of taking decisions of hiring local talent based on fears that it will create dissatisfaction among the Indian staff. We need to take bold decisions and hire local talent, else we may end up killing the industry itself,” he warned.

If you were to check out the ratio of Indian employees in any of our companies that sets up shop overseas, you will find that more than 70% of them are people of Indian origin. “Why wouldn’t the local people feel alienated by such a development. It is up to our companies to lure local talent, which of course is not an easy job given the need for better brand building for our companies,” he said.

Source:http://news.in.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4504150

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Did lobbyists use foreign money to defeat anti-outsourcing bill?

October 9th, 2010

On October 5th Lee Fang of ThinkProgress.org reported that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has been instrumental in defeating bills aimed at repealing the tax incentives that encourage outsourcing, has opened its membership to foreign entities. These entities run the gamut of American businesses based overseas, to foreign corporations such as British Petroleum and Siemens, to foreign corporations OWNED BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS, such as the Bank of India and Bahrain Petroleum Company.

Entities that join the Chamber, which pay dues depending on the size of their organization, can pay dues ranging from $500 to hundred of thousands of dollars a year. The ThinkProgress piece does not specify what portion of the Chambers budget is used to influence political legislation, elections or discourse, but the Center for Responsive Politics reported that in 2009, for the first time, the “U.S.” Chamber of Commerce outspent BOTH the Republican and Democratic parties in terms of lobbying activities, organizing and political advertising. It seems those who have long sought a viable third party need wait no longer. That party is now here, even if its hand is hidden. Shades of the “Trade Federation,” that morphed into the Evil Empire in Star Wars. Was George Lucas a prophet of sorts?

The ThinkProgress piece notes the twin developments of the Chamber’s aggressive overseas fundraising campaign, mostly through “business councils,” and “AmChams” and the fact that the Chamber has pledged “an unprecendented $75 million” to defeat mostly, if not entirely, Democratic candidates in a number of states, including California, Pennsylvania, among others. Also since the Chamber has been largely successful in seeking to stop oversight of political monies, (in fact, the activities of the Chamber’s branch in Russia are conducted in secret) there is no means to independently verify whether or not the Chamber is transferring dues and other payments from its foreign members into its political war chest in the U.S. If any internal firewall exists, the Chamber is not revealing it or its workings even amidst the firestorm these revelations have created.

The ThinkProgress piece has resulted in members of the Senate calling for a Federal Elections Commission investigation into the Chambers funding of political ads this election season. A follow-up piece at ThinkProgress reported those calls for investigation as well as the statement Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, who had no doubt that the Chamber was using a “back-door way to get around long-standing and legitimate restriction,” such as the restrictions against foreign money funding campaigns in the United State. Of course, if the Chamber is successful in promoting its own candidates the likelihood that it will be held to account for campaign violations becomes much more remote.

Unasked, however, was the role that foreign money had in the lobbying efforts to defeat the “Create American Jobs and End Offshoring Act,” the so-called anti-outsourcing bill which I described in an earlier article. It as though there has been a very quiet and very successful coup in Washington. An unelected group called lobbyists are now in charge. Worse, we can no longer even assume that are Americans, at least in any meaningful sense of the word.

Source:-http://www.examiner.com/city-buzz-in-denver/did-lobbyists-use-foreign-money-to-defeat-anti-outsourcing-bill

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Lauding defeat of US anti-outsourcing bill premature

September 30th, 2010

The Senate might have quashed Democrat plans to force U.S. firms to produce jobs and profits at home, rather than overseas, but India Inc is wrong to think the danger has passed.Indian employees at a call centre provide service support to international customers in Bangalore March 17, 2004. REUTERS/Sherwin Crasto/Files

Over the past few weeks, India’s newspapers have been littered with stories surrounding U.S. President Barack Obama’s comments on curbing outsourcing, and India Inc’s gross indignation at the White House’s intentions.

No surprise, then, to see bullish headlines following the Senate vote that effectively ended legislation dubbed the Creating American Jobs and End Offshoring Act. ‘India Inc cheers defeat of anti-outsourcing bill in US‘, ran one leading daily, while another led with ‘Anti-outsourcing Bill dies a quiet death in the US‘. Death is wide of the mark.

With the crucial November mid-term elections looming, the biggest issue for U.S. voters is the economy, with many angry that the lauded economic stimulus Bill passed last year has not prevented the unemployment rate rising above 10 percent. The ball is in Obama’s court, and if he can’t rectify the situation, the Democrats will likely suffer at the hands of the electorate in two months’ time.

Thus for the Republicans — who if in power would surely be contemplating similar anti-outsourcing legislation to appease angry voters seeing jobs flourish in Bangalore instead of Baltimore — the goal is to show Obama and the Democrats as an incapable party, unable to govern and unable to fix the problems. And that means blocking legislation.

The Senate voted 53-45 for the bill, far short the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster, with four Democrats crossing the aisle. Democrats portrayed the Republicans as “job-killers” afterwards, but no political analyst would deny that Republicans play the patriot card far more often than their opponents.

This wasn’t all about jobs, it was also about politics. And that’s why India Inc is not out of the woods yet.

After November, when the dust settles and – most likely – Obama faces a Clinton-like situation of governing over a split legislature for the remainder of his term, the public will demand political compromise to improve the economy.

Then, with far less gains to be had in playing politics, and the rise of the far-right Tea Party to counter, both sides may well favour a bill that protects American jobs at the expense of those elsewhere.

Source:http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/lauding-defeat-of-us-anti-outsourcing-bill-premature/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Anti-outsourcing bill blocked in US Senate

September 30th, 2010

This Round goes to India, courtesy the Republican party. A bill moved in the Senate by the Democrats to bring jobs back to America by granting payroll tax breaks to participating companies was defeated on Tuesday by 53 to 45 votes. A US squeeze on outsourcing had become a major worry for India as
it was feared the state of Ohio, which banned outsourcing in August of government funded projects, might trigger a chain reaction.
What was even more worrying for India was the stand taken by President Barack Obama and his Democratic party on the issue: he said he was completely opposed to shipping job abroad.

The measure — A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create American jobs and to prevent the offshoring of such jobs overseas — was put to vote on Tuesday and defeated in a a vote predictably along party lines.

The Business Roundtable, a pressure group comprising the US’s top CEOs, who account for $ 6 trillion in revenues and employ 12 million people, wrote a letter to the senate arguing for the move to be dropped.

Indian minister and officials has opposed ban on outsourcing for entirely different reasons — restrictive trade practice (in theory), but actually hurting many Indian businesses with huge stakes in the outsourcing market.

Commerce minister Anand Sharma forcefully argued for it in his talks here with the US trade representative, and foreign secretary Nirupama Rao raised it with her interlocutors while discussing the coming presidential visit.

Source:-http://www.hindustantimes.com/Anti-outsourcing-bill-blocked-in-US-Senate/Article1-606247.aspx

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Forrester downplays impact of proposed anti-outsourcing laws in US

June 29th, 2010

The recent spate of anti-outsourcing legislations proposed in the US, like Senator Schumer’s Bill to tax American companies that route customer calls overseas, will not impact business decisions related to offshoring, according to Forrester Research Vice-President and Principal Analyst, Mr John McCarthy.

“It makes for great political saber-rattling and promotion but we know that 90 per cent of legislations that get proposed go nowhere and even then it changes form dramatically between initiation and final version. Also, every time there is any legislation with any offshore language, it gets watered down at the eleventh hour and nothing really happens,” Mr McCarthy told Business Line.

His comments come at a time when the buzz around anti-outsourcing has been growing strong in the Capitol Hill. The House passed ‘American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act’ in May and a month later US Senator Charles Schumer announced plans to introduce a Bill that seeks to impose 25 cents excise tax on any customer service call that originates within the US and gets transferred to an overseas call centre. The proposed legislation, if it materialises, would require US companies to also notify their customers when their calls are handled by an overseas location.

Unveiling the broad contours of the Bill, Senator Schumer had said, “This Bill will not only serve to maintain call centre jobs currently in the US, but also provide a reason for companies that have already outsourced jobs, to bring them back.”

But Mr McCarthy downplays concerns over such legislations that are being mulled. “Talk to me about the Bill… Do not talk to me on what is being proposed… You have to be realistic…Do you think we will suddenly bring thousands of people back? ….. it is not a likely scenario,” says McCarthy.

“The dynamics here are not going to change, they are not going to shut it down they cannot shut it down. And the reality is that there is as much wage inflation in the US in the high tech sector as there is over here, and jobs have gone up despite the offshoring,” said McCarthy.

When contacted, the Nasscom President, Mr Som Mittal, felt that any move by the US to impose a levy on customer service calls routed overseas, would only increase costs for US firms and consumers.

Source:-http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/29/stories/2010062953240700.htm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes