Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Yahoo finally announces deal to integrate Twitter

February 25th, 2010

Yahoo announced a new partnership with Twitter this morning.

Twitter will be integrated into a number of Yahoo products. Users will be able to update their statuses from Yahoo and share Yahoo stories in their Twitter streams directly.

Yahoo already has a similar deal with Facebook, and will now offer its users the ability to update statuses on both networks simultaneously, as they would on an aggregator like TweetDeck. This makes sense as part of Yahoo’s model of being “your home on the Internet.”

Most of the integration will be rolled out later this year. The immediate impact is that search results from Yahoo now include real time results from Twitter’s feed. The feature works exactly as it does on Google and Bing. Since Yahoo will soon be outsourcing search to Microsoft, which already has a Twitter deal, this is nothing Yahoo users weren’t expecting.

Source:http://www.businessinsider.com/yahoo-joins-the-we-have-a-search-deal-with-twitter-club-2010-2

Post to Twitter

Bay company at the top of the Google pile

February 20th, 2010

A PORT Elizabeth software development company is ranked top of the crop on mega search engine Google.

Whenever an internet user searches for web-based business solutions, CompRSA is the first link to appear.

Based at the King’s Court Complex in the Bay, the company has received the most hits for web-based business solutions on Google over the past four weeks.

Founder and chief executive Johan Swart said it was “an honour and a major achievement to be at the top of an international search engine like Google”.

Swart, who founded Comp- RSA 10 years ago, attributed their success to “product development, the services we provide and the fact we know how to do search engine optimisation”.

“There are certain criteria to be placed at the top. It also depends on how long you’ve been in business – and your achievements count.

“We appear first on 204 search engine sites,” explained Swart.

CompRSA specialises in web- based business solutions development and outsource software development.

“We provide outsourcing solutions, staff augmentation, implementation consultants and offshore development services to enterprises worldwide,” said Swart.

Services include web-based application development, outsourcing, website development and Legacy Application Development.

CompRSA’s clients include estate agents who use the RealVID product for online auctioning worldwide, while motor sales companies makes use of AuctionRSA which is an online reverse bidding site.

Other products include CompSMS, a web-based SMS application for sending bulk SMSs.

Comptags is a new product in South Africa which uses radio frequency for identification.

“We landed the sole distribution rights for CompTags from a major German supplier,” said Swart.

SMS2work enables two-way SMS communication by helping blue collar workers find employment.

“We’ve approached Business Against Crime and are still looking for a cellphone company and bank who will join the project.”

Swart also owns Ciglit, a brand of electronic cigarette which is non-flammable.

He also owns four World Cup guide sites, namely the PE World Cup Guide, the Durban World Cup Guide, the Cape Town World Cup Guide and the Johannesburg World Cup Guide.

Swart employs 34 staff members and also offers a 24-hour support help desk service to his company’s US-based clients.

Source:http://www.weekendpost.co.za/business/article.aspx?id=533640

Post to Twitter

Google’s Gmail selected to replace email service across campus

January 26th, 2010

University of Alberta students will start to notice some changes with their school email, as the institution has taken the first steps towards outsourcing the service to Google.

It is expected that the move could save the school up to $1 million per year.

Jonathan Schaeffer, the U of A’s vice provost of information technology, considered the change after learning of email security risks through an audit. The risk stems from having many different email systems on campus.

“I found to my surprise that we have at least 30 independent email systems. It was obvious to me that we really needed one email, and I investigated options for unifying all of the email systems on campus,” he said.

But Schaeffer discovered that implementing a unified system would cost millions of dollars, which led him to investigate external outsourcing.

Schaeffer explained that the change has a long list of benefits, including everything from consolidation of on-campus I.T. infrastructure to increased mailbox size and calendaring for individual users.

However, there is a possibility that the servers that house Google data could be stored in the United States, but the U of A has taken steps to ensure that privacy is maintained.

“We’ve worked on a privacy impact assessment that raised no red flags. We’ve done all our due diligence there and we feel very comfortable. There are risks, but the risks are manageable,” Schaeffer said.

He also believes that people need to be aware of the differences between the public Gmail and the education edition of Gmail that the University may implement.

“The fundamental difference is that for the education edition, the University owns the data and Google is the custodian of it. And that has big implications. For example, on the public email, [Google's systems] read your email and use it to target advertising. That cannot happen on the education edition,” he said.

Currently, U of A lawyers are working on a contract with Google, and unless that contract is satisfactory, Schaeffer noted that they won’t proceed.

There are forums for students to express concerns and learn more about the potential change. And according to Students’ Union Vice President (Academic) Leah Trueblood, most students have had a few concerns over security, but come away satisfied.

“I’ve generally found students to be pretty savvy and receptive to moving forward in any direction,” she said.

However, first-year Science student Zach Siewert isn’t sure about outsourcing to an outside domain.

“Gmail seems to work all right, but I don’t know if we should switch to a third party,” he said. “If anything were to go wrong with Gmail, I’d prefer for the University to have their own email server.”

First-year law student John Schmidt is happy to leave WebMail behind, especially if it saves the University money.

“[Gmail] would be better because WebMail is really old, not very good to use, and it’s difficult to forward to iPhones,” he said.

The switch to Gmail is not only about overhauling email, but also about new technologies and keeping up with tools students are using.

“What I’m trying to do through this is hopefully make the campus more aware of different types of technologies and opportunities that are [in the] real world for our students right now, but maybe aren’t part of the mindset of how we think a traditional university should run,” Schaeffer said.

According to Schaeffer, there are several other universities in line to proceed with Google if the U of A does make the switch. The time of decision is unpredictable and depends on the contract.

Source:http://thegatewayonline.ca/articles/news/2010/01/25/google-s-gmail-selected-replace-email-service-across-campus

Post to Twitter

Google puts focus on China cyberwar fears

January 21st, 2010

Google Inc’s threat to quit China over cyber attacks and censorship highlights US fears that a more powerful Beijing is tapping government and corporate computer networks to steal secrets and to prepare for potential conflicts.

Ties between the United States, the world’s largest economy, and China, a rising rival, are already strained by jockeying for resources, regional influence, currency exchange rate advantages, trade protectionism charges and arms sales to Taiwan, among other things.

US intelligence agencies for years have warned government officials and corporations that Chinese hackers have been piercing sensitive networks and preparing for any clash as bilateral ties wax and wane.

Outsourcing, a cost-cutting strategy adopted by many U.S. companies, contributes to the cyber threat, according to Larry Wortzel, a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, an advisory panel to Congress.

“Companies that locate their research and development in China and employ Chinese citizens to work on their software have probably made Chinese intelligence and security services better at computer hacking,” said Wortzel, a former U.S. Army attache in Beijing.

“They learn the holes in the system and the codes to access programs to do software updates — trapdoors that leave the U.S. vulnerable to attack,” he said in an email interview.

Moving hardware, chip and server production to China “gives Chinese employees or security organizations opportunities to embed their own code and trapdoors into the hardware as they put the code in,” Wortzel said.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was scheduled to deliver on Thursday what was being billed as a major speech on Internet freedom. “The ability to operate with confidence in cyberspace is critical in a modern society and economy,” said Kurt Campbell, the department’s top official for East Asia.

Skills could help wartime attacks

Google owns the world’s most popular Internet search engine. It jolted U.S.-China ties with its Jan. 12 announcement that it had faced a “highly sophisticated and targeted attack” in mid-December allegedly from inside China.

Targeted at the same time, Google said, were more than 20 other companies in finance, technology, media and chemicals. At issue, it said, was more than a simple security breach, though Google said a primary target was dissidents’ email accounts.

The U.S. State Department is pressing China for an explanation of the incidents described by Google.

U.S. military and government networks “continue to be the target of intrusions that appear to have originated from within” China, Navy Admiral Robert Willard, head of the U.S. Pacific Command, said on Jan. 13, one day after Google aired its complaint.

While most penetrations are fishing expeditions, Willard told the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee “the skills being demonstrated would also apply to wartime computer network attacks.”

U.S. national security officials and independent security experts increasingly are voicing alarm about alleged Chinese cyber espionage. For its part, Washington also has a vast espionage corps to steal secrets for its security interests.

China’s embassy dismissed any suggestion that Beijing was behind cyber attacks against U.S. interests.

“As China is more than ever integrated with the rest of the world through, and reliant on, the Internet, it has no reason to do anything that will harm or backfire on its own interests,” Wang Baodong, an embassy spokesman, said by email.

Last February, Dennis Blair, the director of national intelligence, said state and non-state foes were targeting U.S. telecommunications networks, Internet and critical industries’ technological underpinning. Cyber attacks were growing more sophisticated and more serious, he said, singling out Russian and Chinese capabilities.

Chinese hackers’ tracks have been detected inside some U.S. electricity grids and they “don’t seem to care about getting caught,” said Joel Brenner, former director of the Office of the National CounterIntelligence Executive.

“Do I worry about those grids, and about air traffic control systems, water supply systems, and so on? You bet I do. Our networks are being mapped,” Brenner told an April 3 forum at the University of Texas at Austin.

China is also preparing for any clash over Taiwan.

James Mulvenon of the Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis, a consultant to U.S. intelligence agencies, said hackers controlled by Beijing might target U.S. logistics and other support systems in a crisis over the self-ruled island.

“The Chinese military appears to believe that they can use hacking to exploit our perceived dependencies on cyber systems, and thereby disrupt our deployment to a regional contingency,” Mulvenon said in an email interview.

China deems Taiwan a rogue province subject to unification with the mainland, if necessary by force. The United States is Taiwan’s main arms supplier and is mandated by the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act to aid its self-defense.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission told Congress two months ago that Chinese authorities seem to be recruiting skilled cyber operators from information technology firms and computer science programs into the ranks of “Information Warfare Militia units.”

The Daily Beast last week cited what it called a classified FBI report that estimated China’s army has more than 30,000 cyberspies plus more than 150,000 private-sector computer experts assigned to steal U.S. military and technology secrets. The FBI declined to comment.

In its China complaint, Google linked to the commission’s report and to a study done for it by Northrop Grumman Corp, the Pentagon’s No. 3 supplier by sales. The study said Beijing appeared to be conducting “a long-term, sophisticated, computer network exploitation campaign” against the government and U.S. defense industries.

Overall, the United States faces “an exceptionally serious” challenge, said Linton Wells II, acting chief information officer at the U.S. Defense Department in 2004 and 2005.

“Corporate intellectual property is being stolen in many fields: information technology, bio-technology, defense industrial base, financial, transportation, energy, and others,” said Wells, now at the National Defense University’s Center for Technology and National Security Policy. “Critical components on which our economy, government and national security are based are at risk.”

In June, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates ordered the creation of the military’s first headquarters to mesh Pentagon efforts in the emerging cyberspace battlefield and computer-network security arenas. The new command will develop offensive cyber weapons as well as defend against them.

Source:http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/world-news/google-puts-focuschina-cyberwar-fears_437018.html

Post to Twitter

Google hacking attack highlights need for security, says expert

January 20th, 2010

The recent hacking attempt on Google and other major companies shows the need for effective security solutions, IT outsourcing users have been told.

A post on the search engine’s official blog explained that the firm was the target of a “highly sophisticated” attack its corporate infrastructure, with 20 other companies caught up in the attempt.

The organisation also revealed that several of its Gmail accounts were the target of a phishing scam which saw hackers try to obtain the personal details of users.

Commenting on the news, Amichai Shulman, chief technology officer at IT solutions provider Imperva, said that the attack shows that companies are always at risk of security breaches.

“People are still falling for the simplest tricks in the book. Send them an email with the right content in the ‘to’ field and a compelling text and they’ll do anything – including disclosing their password and installing malware,” he explained.

The expert also said that firms can protect themselves from security breaches by employing an IT outsourcing provider to track down phishing campaigns and supply security solutions to defeat them.

Source:http://www.ihotdesk.com/article/19565691/Google-hacking-attack-highlights-need-for-security,-says-expert

Post to Twitter

Google finds little support so far for its China threat

January 16th, 2010

Google’s threat to pull out of China is getting very little support from other businesses or the U.S. government. And that’s because Google is irrelevant to the overall forces shaping global businesses.

Within perhaps a generation, China will become the world’s largest economy. And if China gains some small part of its growth because it successfully stole intellectual property from U.S. firms, it would likely be seen as a cost of doing business there.

Western powers didn’t expand their territories years ago by politely asking native people for their lands — most took whatever they needed. China will do the same, but instead of going after territory, China, in this new era, is going after intellectual property and trade secrets from companies that fail to defend what they have.

U.S. companies did not line up this week to back Google’s position or express much alarm over the security issues in that country. Indeed, TechAmerica, the nation’s largest technology industry group, whose members, collectively, have a massive presence in China, sent out a tepid response to Google’s announcement.

The industry group’s president, Phillip Bond, a former undersecretary in the U.S. Department of Commerce, said in a statement that “reports of cyberattacks from China are not news to the cybersecurity community. Cybersecurity risks emanating from China are ongoing and are very real for all of us.”

TechAmerica is concerned about the security issues and will raise them as part of their policy recommendations to the incoming White House cyber security coordinator, he added.

The U.S. government plans to send a formal letter in the next few days to China in response to Google’s charges. “It will express our concern for this incident and request information from China as to an explanation on how it happened and what they plan to do about it,” said a U.S. Statement Department spokesman.

The U.S. has not accused China of cyber industrial espionage. Even if it could prove China’s guilt, it may never make the findings public. U.S. officials may determine that such knowledge should be kept in the bank.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is expected to speak on Internet censorship issues some time next week. But don’t expect much beyond a letter and a speech from the U.S., because the real drama isn’t Google, it’s in the South China Sea.

The U.S. and China continue to have little military confrontations that hint to the underlying tensions. Just this past March, the U.S. hosed, literally, the Chinese Navy.

The U.S. ship Impeccable (officially an oceanographic ship) was, according to a U.S. government account, 70 miles south of Hainan Island when five Chinese vessels closed in on it. The Department of Defense release this account of what happened next: “Crewmen aboard the Impeccable used fire hoses to spray one of the vessels as a protective measure. The Chinese crewmembers disrobed to their underwear and continued closing to within 25 feet. ”

The crew of the Impeccable used their fire hoses to try to keep the Chinese back, and if U.S. businesses are worried about China, then they better have their hoses ready as well.

Source:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9145300/Google_finds_little_support_so_far_for_its_China_threat

Post to Twitter

Sergey Brin comments on Yahoo, Microsoft Search Outsourcing Deal

October 24th, 2009

Taking Thursday’s Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco by surprise, co-founder of Google made an appearance at the venue and answered numerous curious questions which are currently affecting the search engine company. This was also where he stated that Yahoo’s latest decision to get into a search outsourcing deal with software giant Microsoft is lamentable. The statement came when Google’s mastermind was being interviewed on stage by Conference Chairman John Battelle.

Under the said deal, Yahoo would have to do away with its current back-end search indexing and crawling systems and make use of Microsoft’s new search engine Bing as a mode of powering its own search engine.

While Brin did not fail to compliment and congratulate Yahoo on trying new things and putting forward interesting innovations, he did express his disappointment on the decision taken by Yahoo which is currently the second largest search engine after Google. “I think it’s a shame Yahoo plans to abdicate that area because they were doing interesting things”, Brin said.

Although Brin made no comments on his thoughts on Government regulations and whether it should approve the Yahoo-Microsoft deal or not, he did admit that via Bing, everyone, including Google, has been reminded that the search engine market is very competitive.

Source: http://www.stockwatch.in/sergey-brin-comments-yahoo-microsoft-search-outsourcing-deal-23964

Post to Twitter

“We’re through the recession,” says Google

October 16th, 2009

Google’s business is picking up again, with third quarter revenues up seven percent on the same period last year. The company now says it feels confident about investing heavily in the future.

“The worst of the recession is behind us,” said CEO Eric Schmidt.

The company reported revenues of $5.94 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The US accounted for just under half of this.

Google-owned sites generated revenues of $3.96 billion – 67 percent of total revenues – in the quarter, eight percent up on last year.

Through AdSense programs, Google’s partner sites generated revenues of $1.80 billion, 30 percent of the total, up seven percent on last year.

The company has been tightening its belt over the last two quarters, cutting its headcount by about 500. As a result, profits for the quarter grew even faster than revenues, hitting $1,64 billion – up 27 percent on a year ago.

* IBM has also been working to cut costs, largely through automation and outsourcing, and has also seen profits for the quarter rise. Net income was $3.2 billion, up 14 percent on last year, on revenues that fell by seven percent compared to the same period last year.

Source: http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/44319/118/

Post to Twitter

IBM raises outlook Google back on growth track

October 16th, 2009

IBM raised its full-year outlook and reported higher-than-expected quarterly profit yesterday as its growing focus on higher-margin software and services businesses helped it cope with weak technology spending.

IBM still failed to satisfy investors, whose expectations had built up along with a 24-per-cent rise in the shares. A seven-per-cent drop in service contract numbers, an indication of future business, also worried Wall St.

“I think people had expected a bigger upside,” said Kim Caughey, an analyst with Fort Pitt Capital. “If you are someone who follows technology closely, the third quarter isn’t a strong quarter – so that they beat (the street) at all, I’m happy.”

Indeed, IBM reported third-quarter net profit rose to $3.2 billion, or $2.40 a share, from $2.8 billion, or $2.04 a share, a year earlier. Analysts on average expected a profit of $2.38 per share, according to Thomson Reuters.

Revenue fell seven per cent from a year earlier to $23.6 billion, although it rose one per cent from the previous quarter and was better than Wall St.’s forecast of $23.4 billion.

IBM forecast a return to revenue growth in the fourth quarter.

IBM has managed to escape the worst of the tech downturn of the past year by shifting more of its sales from servers to software and services in outsourcing, automation and technology support – areas that have remained relatively strong as companies seek ways to cut costs.

IBM shares, which had risen on hopes of a recovery in technology spending, fell 3.6 per cent to $123.30 after closing at $127.98 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Google Inc.’s growth machine is back in gear.

The world’s No. 1 search engine not only posted higher-than-expected third-quarter profits and revenues, but also said it was looking for major acquisitions and could buy a large company “maybe every year or two.”

“While there is a lot of uncertainty about the pace of economic recovery, we believe the worst of the recession is behind us and now feel confident about investing heavily in our future,” Google CEO Eric Schmidt said.

“We’re open for business in making strategic acquisitions, both large and small,” he told analysts on a conference call.

Shares of Google, which have surged over 80 per cent since mid-March and set a fresh 52-week high this week, rose 3.2 per cent to $547 in extended trading.

Net revenue in the third quarter – excluding traffic acquisition costs, or the money that Google shares with partners – rose 8.5 per cent from a year earlier to $4.38 billion, beating the $4.24 billion expected by analysts.

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. reported a quarterly net loss that beat Wall St. expectations on the back of strong notebook processor shipments.

But its shares fell five per cent as investors cashed in gains that resulted, in part, from the blockbuster earnings reported by rival Intel earlier in the week. Even with the drop, AMD’s shares were up 11 per cent from the start of last week.

AMD posted a net loss of $128 million, or 18 cents per share, for the third quarter, ended Sept. 26, compared with a net loss of $134 million, or 22 cents per share, a year earlier.

Source: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/todays-paper/raises+outlook/2108406/story.html

Post to Twitter

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes