Posts Tagged ‘Indiana’

Indiana sues IBM sues indiana over outsourcing contract

July 29th, 2010

A few days back I posted this blog about the outsourcing troubles between Texas and IBM. Basically, the Texas Department of Information Resources sent a letter to IBM detailing what it calls “chronic failures” of agreed service levels in a multi-year, multi-million-dollar outsourcing contract initiated in 2006. Then, a colleague alerted me to another IBM and state government outsourcing relationship gone sour.

In this battle, IBM is suing Indiana is suing IBM (the suits were filed in May). The point of contention: a 10-year, $1.6 billion outsourcing contract that’s about automating intake for Indiana’s social services system. You can read more about it here, in Government Technology.

Basically, the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) is trying to recover $437.6 million it paid IBM through Jan. 31, because it says the system is kaput. The suit also asks for costs of any third-party lawsuits, federal penalties and employee overtime, plus triple damages worth more than $1.3 billion. For its part, IBM has sued Indiana for $52.8 million, reportedly for hardware, software and automated processes Indiana IMB left there and Indiana is still using.

There are a lot of charges flying around.

According to the Government Technology article, each side disputes the other’s claims. Indiana says data errors in the IBM system led to backlogs and service denials. IBM blames the recession and natural disasters that occurred in the state, such as the 2008 Midwest floods, which led to higher than expected social service caseloads.In this article in the Evansville Courier Press, IBM is not backing down. It is especially upset about $9.3 million worth of equipment, and complained earlier this month in a letter to Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller, the newspaper reported. “The state has neither paid the invoice nor returned the equipment to IBM. The state and its subcontractors continue to use IBM’s equipment today in the operation of the state’s welfare eligibility system throughout the state without compensation to IBM,” according to the letter.

Indiana shows now signs of forgiveness either. Back in May, in the Government Technology article, FSSA spokesman Marcus Barlow said the FSSA had enough caseworkers to handle the load, adding that “there was more staff working on eligibility during IBM’s tenure than before IBM came, yet the results show that once IBM put their system in place, timeliness got worse, error rates went higher. Backlogs got larger.” He then pointed specifically to IBM’s system for many of the errors and delays.There’s been no settlement. And it may be a while before anything gets determined.

According to the Evansville Courier Press, IBM wants the trial to start in July 2011, while the state is apparently pushing for February 2012.

I’ve heard some interesting comments from the blog regarding Texas and IBM, and I’d like to hear more. Who’s to blame here, IBM or Indiana? And are we going to see more and more lawsuits like this going forward? I mean, I remember the days of big ERP implementations gone bad, with plenty of blame and lawsuits to go around. I think the lesson from that mess was vendors needed to buck up and fix ERP. But buyers learned too: monolithic, multi-year ERP projects were not the way to go. What does all this say about outsourcing?

Source:http://advice.cio.com/beth_bacheldor/11294/indiana_sues_ibm_sues_indiana_over_outsourcing

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Indiana Cancels Huge Outsourced Welfare Modernization Plan

October 17th, 2009

Calling the concept unworkable, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has pulled the plug on his state’s troubled plan to modernize and privatize its welfare system. In a news conference Thursday, Oct. 15, Daniels announced that Indiana had terminated its 10-year, $1.6 billion contract with IBM to streamline welfare eligibility in the state.

Launched in 2007, the new system lets citizens apply for welfare benefits online, in person or via telephone, and it implemented process changes designed to speed up and standardize eligibility determinations. But the initiative drew criticism for high error rates and slow processing of eligibility requests. Last year, the federal government recommended that rollout of the system be halted because it kept welfare recipients waiting too long for benefits.

On Thursday, Daniels said the new process — though well intentioned — was fatally flawed in several respects.

“It had, for instance, the intention to save welfare applicants the burden of a face-to-face meeting [with eligibility workers]. But this led to incomplete applications and confusion about what documents were necessary, and just did not work in practice,” he said. “There was also an attempt to break the [eligibility] determination process into discrete tasks done by specialists and then assemble it again. It looked good on paper, but did not work in practice.”

Daniels said Indiana would revert to in-person meetings between benefits applicants and welfare caseworkers to determine eligibility for state assistance programs.
Working as Intended

IBM rejects the state’s claim that the new system didn’t work, a company spokesman said Friday.

“IBM has been committed to the success of the Indiana welfare modernization project and deeply regrets the state’s decision,” said John Buscemi, IBM’s media relations director for North America. “We have worked diligently and invested significant money and resources in the partnership with the FSSA [Indiana Family and Social Services Administration] to turn around a welfare system that was described by the governor as one of the worst in the nation.”

Buscemi said Indiana’s transition to the new system was made more difficult by the economic recession and last winter’s Midwest floods. Those factors and others triggered a 33 percent increase in social service applications since the modernization began, he said.

Still, Buscemi contended that the initiative had made significant progress, noting that more than 231,000 welfare applications have been filed online since the project began.

“We developed a Web portal through which roughly two-thirds of all applications for benefits are now filed. This helps the state to digitize applications and files to make the system more responsive,” he said. “Right now, more than 25 percent of Indiana citizens requesting access and applications to social services benefits do so from their home PC. So this substantially improves the process for applicants with mobility issues. They aren’t required to spend a lot of hours at a state assistance office.”
A Hybrid System

After a transition period, the state will assume the role of prime contractor for the welfare system, Daniels said. Indiana officials intend to create a hybrid system that mixes the best parts of IBM’s new process with practices the state used before the outsourcing began.

Besides requiring benefits applicants to meet in-person with eligibility workers, Indiana also will revert to a “case-based” eligibility approach where all aspects of a benefit applicant’s case are handled by a single caseworker or team of caseworkers.

Under the modernization program, the FSSA and IBM implemented a “task-based” approach to determining eligibility that eliminated individually assigned caseworkers. Indiana officials anticipated the change would speed up eligibility decisions for food stamps and other state assistance programs. Instead, the new

approach resulted in too many hands touching a single case, according to the state.

On the other hand, Daniels said Indiana will retain electronic document technology, fraud prevention measures and other improvements developed by IBM.

“The fraud which was rampant in the Indiana welfare system has apparently stopped,” Daniels said. “There hasn’t been a single allegation — let alone conviction — whereas there were dozens before. And official reports say more than $100 million was stolen in the last year before we began to try to make this change.”
Still Expecting Savings

Although the modernization will be scaled back, Daniels still expects the state to save about $40 million over the next 10 years — $10 million less than was estimated under the IBM outsourcing arrangement.

The governor, who has been a proponent of privatizing state services, denied that the initiative’s problems stemmed from outsourcing. “This has nothing to do with a private or public agency doing the work. It has to do with the concept itself,” he said. “If we would have brought in that same concept that IBM used and had state workers do all of the work, we would have had the same result, or worse.”

Daniels also disagreed with criticism that the state lost too many experienced eligibility workers during its transition to the outsourced system.

“A lot of them needed to be gone; they were the ones giving money to their cronies and friends,” he said. “They were running the worst welfare system in America, ranked number 50 in Welfare to Work. The federal government sanctioned Indiana for the failures of its system, so doing nothing was not an option.”

Under the modernization program, 1,500 of the FSSA’s 2,200-member work force were transferred to IBM, which was required to offer them jobs for a minimum of two years. Daniels said Thursday that he didn’t know how many former state workers remained with IBM or its subcontractors.

Both Daniels and Buscemi said FSSA employees still make all final eligibility determinations under the new system. Private workers help citizens through the application process until the application is turned over to a state employee for authorization.

Source:http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/731479

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes