Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

President obama, the problem is obvious,outsourcing our jobs!

September 3rd, 2010

Today in Sacramento almost 1,000 employees of Ocwen Financial Corp. based in West Palm Beach, Fla. were laid off. The company is not closing, they are simply outsourcing the jobs to Uruguay and India.

And in a short time their customers will hear the all too familiar sound of someone thousands of miles away in another country working customer service for another American company. It shouldn’t be this way. And this is the very reason we have a jobs problem in the US.

It doesn’t take a sharp eye to see the sheer number of jobs that have been outsourced to China, India, Pakistan and dozens of other countries in the last 15 years or so. Call centers, manufacturing, you name it and American companies have been shipping those jobs overseas for years. And we’ve allowed it.

I would love to see President Obama take care of the jobs problem. But I don’t think he can. Just like nothing can get done in California. The system is broken and there aren’t enough good people in office to stand up to big money. Even if he manages to create new jobs, which the companies will get tax breaks for, they will just outsource them down the road when they want more profits for Wall Street.

So it may come down to us. Before we make any more purchases maybe we should take a look at where that product is manufactured. It doesn’t take long on Google to find the information and if we all start buying American products a majority of the time we spend our hard earned money then the manufacturers will have to listen.

I’m not waiting on the government to take care of the problem. We have the power to bring the jobs back. It will take time, but a change is necessary and it’s up to us.

Source:http://blog.preferredseat.com/business-news/president-obama-outsourcing-our-jobs/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Obama’s oval office speeech was good, but the gravitas was great

September 1st, 2010

In his residence imprinting the in effect finish of the Iraq War, Obama used the environment well. The flags during the during the back of of him, the family cinema upon presumably side, the dwindle pin in his lapel, the red tie, white shirt as great as blue suit… it all projected nationalism as great as authority.

One thing which worked in the debate was his sketch the true line in in between the immeasurable financial cost of the quarrel as great as the mercantile slough of droop in which we’re mired. One thing which didn’t work was his avowal which with the finish of quarrel in Iraq, we were branch the page. We’re still during war, as great as Obama pronounced which right divided some-more resources have been accessible for Afghanistan.

Politicos will be zodiacally dissatisfied. Liberals will contend he gave George W. Bush as great most credit; conservatives, not enough. But we consider he did himself as great as his celebration the small great tonight. He was inexhaustible sufficient to Bush, unaffected in his intentions as great as patently frank in his regard of the troops. He wore the presidency with an appendage which Americans design as great as appreciate: gravitas.

Source:http://ururkataf.com/obamas-oval-office-speech-was-good-but-the-gravitas-was-great.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Obama steps up outsourcing rhetoric

August 10th, 2010

s per the Bill, companies, where American citizens form less than 50 per cent of the workforce, will have to pay an additional $2,000 on H1B and L1 visas. Speaking in the Rajya Sabha, India’s commerce minister, Mr Anand Sharma, also termed as ‘unfortunate’ the remarks of a US senator calling tech major Infosys a ‘chop-shop’.
Meanwhile, with US mid-term elections less than three months away, the US President, Mr Barack Obama, also scaled up his anti-outsourcing rhetoric. Speaking at a fund-raiser in Texas, Mr Obama said that the country has returned to competitiveness and jobs are no longer migrating to countries such as India, China and Germany.
Gradually getting into the election mode, the US President has been frequently in his public speeches claiming how his policies are aimed towards stopping outsourcing of jobs and manufacturing.
Instead of spending money on special interest tax loopholes that don’t create American jobs, we said we’re going to make smart investments in education and innovation and clean energy that will benefit all people and our entire economy, he said. “Instead of giving special interests free rein to write their own regulations, we demanded new accountability from Washington to Wall Street so that big corporations had to play by the same rules as small companies and individuals. That’s only fair,” Mr Obama said.
India’s commerce minister, however, finds the US policy quite unfair. “Thou-gh the need of the US government to strengthen their border security is understandable, it is inexplicable as to why our companies have to bear the cost of such a highly discriminatory law,” Mr Sharma wrote in a letter to the US trade representative, Mr Ron Kirk.
“It will have an adverse impact on the competitiveness and commercial interests of Indian companies sending professionals to undertake projects locally for American customers in the US,” the minister added.
The minister in his letter expressed the concerns of Indian industry that the bill will impact primarily companies of Indian origin, which account for less than 12 per cent of the total visas issued by the US. While the US firms use these visas in larger numbers, they will not be liable for the increased fees and Indian firms will be affected.

Source:-http://www.asianage.com/business/obama-steps-outsourcing-rhetoric-177

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Citing india, china challenge, obama pushes for education

August 10th, 2010

For the second time in a week, President Barack Obama has pointed to the rise of India and China to ask Americans to produce more graduates to compete globally and regain its top status.

“From Beijing to Bangalore, from Seoul to Sao Paulo new industries and innovations are flourishing; our competition is growing fiercer,” Obama told a crowd at the University of Texas at Austin on Monday.

“We need an economy that puts Americans back to work, an economy that’s built around three simple words – Made in America,” he said amid applause. “Because we are not playing for second place. We are the United States of America… we play for first.”

“I want us to produce eight million more college graduates by 2020, because America has to have the highest share of graduates compared to every other nation,” he said arguing that education was an economic issue.

Noting that America had fallen from first place in college graduates to 12th place in a single generation, Obama called the status quo “unacceptable” but “not irreversible”.

Earlier, at a Democratic party fundraiser too, Obama spoke of the growing competition from India, China and Germany to sell his economic agenda.

“After nearly a decade of economic policies that has given us little more than sluggish job growth, sluggish economic growth, falling incomes, falling wages, a record deficit,” Obama said he had put in place a new economic plan focused on the middle class.

The plan, he said, was aimed at “making them more secure, and making sure that our country was competitive over the long run so the jobs and industries of the future weren’t going to China or India or Germany, but were going to the United States of America, right here”.

Obama’s continued “portrayal of India as trying to take American jobs,” however came in for sharp criticism from a noted US scholar who argued that it was “the wrong way to deal with India”.

“Do as I say, don’t do as I do. This is the message the Obama Administration and the Congress are sending to fellow democracy India,” said Derek Scissors, research fellow in Asia Economic Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

“While correctly pressing India to liberalize trade and investment, President Obama continues to hector India on outsourcing, and the Congress has now turned the talk into ugly action,” he said referring to Senate legislation to raise visa fees for high-skilled foreign workers.

“This was intended to target certain Indian companies by constraining American access to them,” Scissors said arguing “there are strong reasons, in addition to the commercial ones, to engage more fully and equally with India, not punish it.”

“India is a rapidly growing economy driven by its consumers. It is an American friend,” he said.

“Picking on India, especially, tells the world the US commitment to open trade and investment is weakening, a message that will end up hurting both US foreign policy and our economy,” Scissors warned.

Source:http://www.indiaedunews.net/International/Citing_India%2C_China_challenge%2C_Obama_pushes_for_education_12271/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Obama’s anti outsourcing impact on outsourcing

August 3rd, 2010

United States President Barack Obama has said that the new economic plan of his government focused on making the middle class more secure and the country more competitive so that the jobs and industries of the future were not outsourced to China and India.

“When I took office …we put forward a new economic plan that rewards hard work instead of greed; responsibility instead of recklessness; focused on making our middle class more secure and our country more competitive in the long run.

So that the jobs and industries of the future are not all going to China and India, but are being created right here in the U.S.,” Mr. Obama said.

Mr. Obama raised the pitch of outsourcing of jobs to India and China and gave it a political colour at a fund party raiser in Atlanta in the run up to the crucial-mid term election a few months away in which his Democratic party is anticipated to loose majority in the House of Representatives.

“18 months ago, I took office after nearly a decade of economic policies that gave us sluggish growth, falling incomes, a record deficit and policies that culminated in the worst financial crisis that we have seen since the Great Depression,” he said.

A total of 8 million jobs were lost due to great depression, of which 3 million were lost in last six months of 2008, in January 2009, the month I was sworn 750,000 Americans lost their jobs; 600,000 were lost a month later, he added.

Mr. Obama said that instead of spending money on tax breaks, his government was making smart investments in innovation, clean energy and education that were going to benefit the people and the US economy over the long run.

“Instead of giving special interests free reign to do whatever they want, we are demanding new accountability from Wall Street to Washington — so that big corporations have to play by the same rules that small businesses and entrepreneurs do,” he said.

The U.S. President assured the gathering that it would take some time to dig themselves out from the “such a deep hole” that was created due to the policies of the last decade.

He said that instead of losing millions of jobs, his administration has created jobs for six straight months in the private sector.
Asking the people to vote for Democratic Party in the coming elections, he said that as a result of his policies the U.S. economy was expanding instead of contracting, so the last thing we would want to do is go back to what we were doing before.

“The choice in this election is whether people want to go forward or to go backwards to the same policies that got the U.S. into this mess in the first place. The choice in this election is between policies that encourage job creation here in America or encourage jobs to go elsewhere.

“That’s why I have said instead of giving tax breaks to corporations that want to ship jobs overseas, we want to give tax breaks to companies that are investing right here in the U.S.,” Mr. Obama said.

“They are more interested in the next election than the next generation. And that’s why they can’t have the keys back — because we need somebody who is driving with a vision to the future. That’s what we have been doing over these last 20 months,” he said.

“We are also jumpstarting a home-grown, clean energy industry because I don’t want to see the solar panels and the wind turbines and the biodiesel created in other countries,” he said.

“I don’t want China and Germany and Brazil to get the jump on us in the industries of the future. I want to see all that stuff right here in the U.S., with American workers. The investments we have made so far are expected to create 800,000 jobs by 2012,” Mr. Obama said.

This has given a clear signal of US economy on it’s way to progress. Here we need to emphasise that the act undertaken by Obama is bringing US economy back to it’s growth phase unlike major disaster covered with scandals.

This growth will add more job potential to outside countries as well.

Source:http://www.outsource2india.biz/2010/08/obamas-anti-outsourcing-impact-on.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

White house, citing waste, freezes IT projects

July 1st, 2010

President Obama’s approach to IT spending showed its teeth this week in a decision to end new spending on about 30 financial systems that cost about $3 billion in annual development.

TechAmerica, a large IT industry group, said Wednesday that some of the large IT vendors and integrators working on these projects could stand to take a multibillion-dollar hit as a result and will likely have to redeploy hundreds of IT workers to other projects. The total lifetime cost of the affected IT projects was put at $20 billion by the White House.

“You are bringing to a screeching halt some very significant programs,” said Trey Hodgkins, TechAmerica’s vice president of national security and procurement policy. If IT contractor personnel are moved to other assignments, restarting the IT modernization work on the financial systems will likely raise the cost of the projects when, or if, this work resumes, he said.

“It’s going to cost the federal government, we believe, more money by taking this action then they will actually be saving,” Hodgkins said.

But Tim Dowd, the president and CEO of market research firm Input Inc., doesn’t see the White House action as an automatic setback for IT vendors, and cites his firm’s projection that federal IT spending, which was at $86 billion in 2010, will grow to $112 billion in 2015, at a compound annual growth rate of 5.4%.

Dowd said the action on the financial services systems may be more of pruning or refocusing of federal IT spending by the administration.

“It is probably a fairly prudent decision,” Dowd said of the White House freeze, given that “there is probably a lot of redundancy” in financial systems. The government may move some of this money to more important priorities, he said.

Peter Orszag, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, announced the freeze in a blog post this week. To illustrate the point, he cited some specific system problems, including two at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The VA “has invested over $300 million in two financial system projects over the past 10 years. The first project ended in failure and no operational capability has been realized with the second,” Orszag wrote in a post published on the OMB’s Web site.

Federal CIO Vivek Kundra, who will be conducting a review of the financial systems, has long been a critic of the federal IT procurement process, and is openly envious of the private sector’s ability to share common platforms across enterprises and to deploy new systems quickly — whereas the federal government tends to hire contractors who remain “on the payroll indefinitely.”

Instead, Kundra has outlined a strategy that has agencies sharing IT resources and cooperating on development. He also said cloud-type environments are an ideal platform for many federal services.

Kundra, for instance, was critical earlier this year of the internal IT operations at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Shortly after he wrote of his concerns in a blog post, the USPTO responded in its own blog post that it would redesign its system and move to a cloud platform.

Some of the financial system projects affected by this action have been on federal watch lists for delays and cost overruns for years, but other IT initiatives could get hit by a similar freeze, such as human resources projects.

“My question is, where will the administration stop? Will they get their fill with the financial systems, or will they keep marching through?” said John Slye, an analyst at Input.

Source:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9178764/White_House_citing_waste_freezes_IT_projects

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Obama administration uses lobbyist memo to Say outsourcing creates jobs

May 18th, 2010

Just before Commerce Secretary Gary Locke went on a high-profile trip to China with 24 business executives to advocate for making it easier to send American jobs overseas, he was quoted in a Bloomberg article making the Orwellian claim that helping these firms expand in China would create more jobs at home. Locke is even using a study prepared by the Business Roundtable, a corporate lobby, that says outsourcing American jobs raises American workers’ standard of living.

Locke’s trip comes as the steps China is taking to develop its own industry are making it tougher for American companies to do business there on their terms. A recent survey by the Chamber of Commerce showed that 38 percent of all American companies feel unwelcome in China. American CEOs feel this isn’t fair and fear that if they are unable to move their operations to China, their profits will suffer.

Among the group of companies going to China is Timken–maker of ball bearings for windmills. In the past Timken had filed trade cases against Japan and China over broken trade laws. Now, with half of Timken’s workforce located in Asia to take advantage of cheaper production costs, Timken is now pressing the Chinese government to let them expand their production in China.

Had the United States took aggressive action, such as tariffs, against China’s unfair trade policies, including their lax environmental/labor standards and illegal currency manipulation, companies like Timken would more likely have expanded in America. As United Steelworkers president Leo Gerard said to Bloomberg News, “We would like to see Timken expanding in America and exporting to China.” Instead, Chinese companies dominate the wind energy market, making 85 percent of the world’s windmills.

The lack of an American industrial policy and a strong Chinese industrial policy make it imperative that companies such as Timken move overseas.

Former Reagan trade official Clyde Prestowitz masterfully explains in his new book, “The Betrayal of American Prosperity,” how America’s decline is due to the embrace of free trade as a “win-win” situation and its failure to intervene in the economy to help developing industries like wind energy manufacturers.

AFL CIO President Richard Trumka has described “The Betrayal of American Prosperity” as “essential reading for workers, activists and policymakers who want to restore the American Dream”.

Prestowitz, Trumka, and Campaign for America’s Future Co-Director Robert Borosage on Tuesday will discuss Prestowitz’s new book and how the U.S. can rebuild its economy. The event starts at 6 p.m. at the AFL-CIO headquarters in downtown Washington. RSVP here to attend this important event.

Source:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-elk/obama-administration-uses_b_579678.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes