Posts Tagged ‘Recession’

Recession fuels self-employment in IT

May 19th, 2010

The recession has forced large numbers of IT professionals into self-employment, according to a global study by employment agency Kelly Services.

The latest Kelly Global Workforce Index obtained the views of approximately 134,000 people, including around 6,000 in the UK, and found that 27 per cent of respondents in the UK IT sector are currently self-employed.

A similar number indicated that they want to start their own business, according to the report.

“Many of those who lost their jobs as a result of the global economic crisis are seizing the opportunity to reinvent themselves as independent contractors, freelancers and consultants, as well as starting their own businesses,” said Kelly Services general manager John Callagher.

“Today, more people are taking charge of their own careers and view self-employment as a way of achieving personal and professional success.”

The trend of IT workers moving into self-employment coincides with many organisations outsourcing non-core functions, according to Kelly.

“Despite economic uncertainty, the idea of moving out of the traditional employment relationship is appealing to those who want the flexibility of working for themselves,” said Callagher.

Alongside IT, the industries with the greatest concentration of self-employed workers are education, government and engineering.

Source:http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2263298/recession-fuels-self-employment

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Opinion: Recession is over, and it’s time for IT to restart the engines

February 9th, 2010

Some people are loath to come right out and say this, but I will: The recession is over, and when the numbers are all sorted, I’m guessing the experts will say we turned the corner early last fall, if not sooner.

Sure, there are qualifiers. With such a deep recession, the recovery may be slow. Jobs are a lagging indicator, and we may have double-digit unemployment for some time to come. And the housing market is still weak.

But the technology sector is far from weak. In fact, technology looks to be leading the charge. Over the past few weeks, there’s been up-and-down news about the economy. But when you home in on tech financials, IT spending forecasts and tech vendors’ quarterly sales figures, things are looking upbeat.

A few weeks ago, for example, Gartner raised its 2010 worldwide IT spending growth projection to 4.6% from 3.3%. Although that’s fairly modest growth, it represents a big swing from 2009’s 4.6% drop in IT spending. Forrester, meanwhile, is projecting 6.6% IT spending growth this year.

Maybe you aren’t terribly concerned because the full effects of this recession were never felt in your IT shop. Chances are good that your IT organization didn’t stop spending entirely and continued rolling out projects, implementing new technologies, maintaining infrastructure and performing upgrades. But there’s a good chance that you did lose some personnel, or at least saw new hiring postponed, and you almost certainly had to cancel or delay some projects. Most IT shops aren’t running at anywhere near full speed.

And if you work in one of those shops, you might want to heed this very sound advice, which Computerworld offered in the story “Recovery Ahead” back on Aug. 10:

“Once the business demand for IT services starts growing in an economic recovery, it’s far too late for an in-house IT department to ramp up to meet that demand. The time to prepare for a recovery is just before the recession starts to bottom out…. You can’t just wait until the recession is declared over.”

That advice may have been difficult to act upon last summer, though. The climate at many organizations has been cautious to the point of paralysis — and that’s completely understandable, given the economic environment.

But, IT leaders, this is your final wake-up call. Six months from now, you won’t be able to afford to be complacent. Business is going to begin to rev up, and now is the time to lobby for new head count, place orders for new enterprise apps and systems, initiate due diligence on major new projects, spend money on training and line up outsourcing partners.

And if it’s still early in your fiscal year, this might also be the time to double-down with your budget on a medium-size project that you’ve had in your back pocket. It should be something that has an excellent chance of saving a big chunk of change or facilitating incremental revenue growth.

If you’re not convinced about the need to act now, remember the principles of supply and demand. IT products and services that haven’t seen much demand lately are sure to be less expensive (and delivered more quickly) today than they will be when things are really booming six months from now. And after the economy upshifts, it will be much more difficult to hire talented people with valuable IT expertise than it is right now. The better talent will go to those who act first.

Sure, recoveries tend to be bumpy, and they come to different companies and industries at different times. Temper my advice with your own company-specific insights. Just be prepared. Properly timing this recovery might save you and your company money and help you address crucial business needs faster. You can’t afford to wait this out.

Source:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/346813/IT_Shops_It_s_Time_to_Restart_Your_Engines

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Analysts Bid Good Riddance to IT Recession

January 18th, 2010

The long line of IT analysts and market researchers who want to say good riddance to the IT recession that has been under way since early 2008 has begun to form, and Computer Economics and Forrester Research are at the front of the line making their prognostications. While the IT spending environment seems to have brightened, it is going to be a while, it seems, before we return to anything like normal–if late 2007 and early 2008 were normal.

According to the Outlook for IT Spending and Staffing in 2010 report put out by Computer Economics at the end of December, based on detailed surveys of 139 IT shops in the United States and Canada, IT managers are anticipating, when you average them out, a 2 percent increase in operational budgets in 2010. Some 52 percent of the IT organizations polled said they expected to increase their operational budgets in 2010, with 32 percent saying they would hold tight; only 16 percent of those polled said they were making cuts.

Computer Economics says that based on its two decades of polling IT shops and modeling IT spending based on what those shops say, when more than half of the base says they are not going to increase their IT operational budgets, then this is a good indication that the economy is in a recession. It certainly was in 2004, when the median annual growth in IT operational budgets stood at a big zero and the economy at large and the IT sector within it were still in recession after the mess in 2000, 2001, and 2002. In 2005, median operational budgets among those polled by Computer Economics rose by 2.5 percent, followed by 4.7 percent growth in 2006, 5 percent in 2007, and 4 percent in 2008. In 2009, the median worked out to a big fat zero again. So 2 percent is looking pretty good. But only by comparison, really.

“Based on our 20 years of tracking IT budgets, all signs point to a recovery year,” explained Frank Scavo, president at Computer Economics in a statement accompanying the firm’s forecasts. “IT executives are prepared to make mid-year adjustments, up or down, based on the strength of the recovery, but right now it appears we see a year of stabilization in IT spending and staffing.”

In terms of IT staffing, only 7 percent of those polled said they would be making cuts in 2010 and 39 percent said they would be adding people this year.

Over at Forrester Research, the company has a larger polling base and does more frequent revisions of IT spending forecasts, and the report that Forrester released last week showed bigger growth numbers. But Forrester is looking only at spending on hard and soft IT wares by companies, not their entire IT budget (which includes staff and other operational costs).

“The technology downturn of 2008 and 2009 is unofficially over,” said Andrew Bartels, Forrester’s vice president and principal analyst in a statement accompanying his projections. “All the pieces are in place for a 2010 tech spending rebound. In the U.S., the tech recovery will be much stronger than the overall economic recovery, with technology spending growing at more than twice the rate of gross domestic product (GDP) this year.”

Forrester is expecting that nominal gross domestic product in the United States will rise by 3.1 percent in 2010, but that IT spending in the States will rise by 6.6 percent this year to $568 billion. While this sounds lovely, it is helpful to remember that IT spending in the United States fell by 8.2 percent in 2008 and was rising by nearly that amount in 2007. We have more ground to make up to get back to where we used to be. Ditto for the global IT market as reckoned by Forrester in U.S. dollars, up 8.1 percent this year to a little more than $1.6 trillion (but only up 5.6 percent when reckoned in local currency).

IT growth is going to be strongest in the United States this year, according to Forrester’s economic models, but the strengthening U.S. dollar is going to make those euros, yuan, yen, pounds, rubles, rupies, and so on spend a lot further when the major IT players located in the States bring the dough back home to bake it into their books. When reckoned in dollars, IT spending in sales in Western and Central Europe is expected to increase by 11.2 percent; Canada will see 9.9 percent growth, thanks to a fairly stable oil economy based on tar sands and America’s insatiable appetite for crude. Forrester expects the Asia/Pacific region will see 7.8 percent growth in IT spending and Latin America will not be far behind at 7.7 percent. However, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa will post only a 2.4 percent increase in IT spending this year, which means in local currencies, these markets are still declining.

Forrester is expecting that spending on computer hardware and software will lead the way in 2010, with hardware spending up 8.2 percent and software spending up 9.7 percent. Communications equipment makers will see an increase in spending of 7.6 percent, IT consulting and system integration services will rise by 6.8 percent, and outsourcing services will exhibit 7.1 percent growth.

We are apparently seeing a new IT boom based on smart infrastructure. (Perhaps we could allocate some money for smart politicians?)

“We are entering a new six- to seven-year cycle of IT growth and innovation that Forrester calls Smart Computing,” explained Bartels, borrowing a marketing campaign from Big Blue. (You’ll be getting a call for trademark infringement from Cravath, Swaine, and Moore any day now. . . . ) “New technologies of awareness married to advanced business intelligence analytics make computing smart. Smart Computing rests on new foundation technologies such as service-oriented architecture, server and storage virtualization, cloud computing, and unified communications. 2010 marks the beginning of this next phase of technology advancement.”

While this sounds like a pipe dream, there is little doubt that IT departments, keen on showing the value of IT to business managers, are going to be passing around the pipe so everyone can have a toke on it. This is how the world goes round. The thing is, computing does evolve, even if a lot of the promises–and smart computing is just one in a long line–do not usually pan out exactly as planned, budgeted, and built.

Source:http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh011810-story02.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Recession shifts renewed attention to U.S. call centers

December 21st, 2009

The recession is changing what companies want in outsourced customer care.

Retailers, telecom and cable TV companies and financial-services giants want more than just to save money by sending call-center work overseas. Now they’re asking outsourcing companies to generate revenue by getting callers to upgrade services or buy more of them.

“Companies, having cut as much cost as they can, are looking to us to help grow the top line,” said Judi Hand, chief marketing officer of TeleTech Holdings Inc., an international outsourcing company. “That may be the thing we’re seeing the most of.”

The trend is leading outsourcing firms to grow aggressively again in the United States, after a decade in which call-center jobs migrated offshore by the thousands.

Instead of adding new call centers in low-cost cities and towns, clients are asking outsourcing companies to use “virtual” call centers employing older, more experienced operators working from home.

Englewood-based TeleTech (NASDAQ: TTEC) employs 45,000 people in 17 countries, but its fastest-growing hiring niche in recent months has been at-home work in the United States, Hand said.

That’s because client companies are more consciously targeting how their customer-care calls are handled during the recession, industry executives say.

High-value customers’ calls are increasingly staying in North America, where costs may be higher than offshore, but at-home operators can generate revenue. Simpler and lower-value tasks, which don’t present sales opportunities, are being routed to offshore operators in larger numbers than ever.

The transition has caused TeleTech some difficulty.

Its revenue declined 17 percent in the first three quarters of 2009 — from $1 billion in 2008 to $887 million this year. Most clients ended 2008 by demanding higher volumes of cheaper offshore services from TeleTech or, in some cases, reducing their outsourcing work. TeleTech laid off hundreds of people worldwide, including several at its headquarters, where more than 500 people work.

“As work moved offshore to lower-cost labor markets, we necessarily had to lower our costs,” Hand said.

TeleTech expects growth to return in coming months, she said.

That’s true elsewhere in the industry, and largely as a result of at-home services.

Denver-based StarTek Inc. (NYSE: SRT) will officially start at-home customer care using U.S. operators in the first quarter of 2010, CEO Larry Jones said. It’s been testing the service for months.

StarTek employs nearly 9,000 people, opened its first overseas call center in the Philippines a year ago, and since has opened a second offshore site in Costa Rica to meet the needs of cost-cutting clients in telecom and cable. It now offers services from 18 North American centers, plus its two offshore.

StarTek, like many other call-center companies, opened and closed call centers in rural areas regularly as it hopscotched around the United States and Canada, in a perpetual search for low-cost but able employees.

Jones believes the growth of domestic at-home call centers is a permanent shift away from that.

“StarTek may never again open a new brick-and-mortar call center in North America,” he said.

Clients want at-home services because that attracts operators who understand a caller’s needs and spot opportunities to make a sale — not just handle a scripted encounter, he said.

“It’s finding someone who can connect with a customer and close a deal,” Jones said. “Add a foreign accent or difficulty connecting personally because of a difference in cultures, and you’re not going to make a sale.”

Source:http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2009/12/21/story10.html?b=1261371600^2611121

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Recession makes Bangaloreans cautious shoppers

December 21st, 2009

If not anything else, global economic recession seems to have taught one or two lessons in economics to India’s IT hub. This festive season, ahead of Christmas and New Year revelry, Bangaloreans are showing “thrift” instead of the usual “splurge” while shopping. While there is no specific data, the city’s prominent shopping hubs, including Brigade Road, Commercial Street and M.G. Road at the city centre, are witnessing a change in the way Bangaloreans shop.

“As usual, festive shoppers have started thronging shops. However, they are spending less and hunting for good bargains,” Suresh R., a trader and a member of the Brigade Shops and Establishments Association (BSEA), told IANS.

Priya Raza, a shop owner on Brigade Road, one of the most popular shopping destinations, said it seemed Bangaloreans were yet to recover from the shock of recession.

Although attractive discount sales are on in several malls, as part of the festive season, Bangaloreans are thinking twice before splurging.

The mood to spend, once popular among Bangalore’s crowd with disposable income, seems to be missing.

“Discount sales are no more pulling crowds to shops. People are buying gifts, clothes and accessories, depending on their needs. The mood to splurge is missing this time,” said Ramesh Makhija of Favourite Shop, a leading shopping destination in Commercial Street.

The economy of Bangalore, mostly driven by the IT industry, was hit hard by global economic recession, which began in the US last year.

Although global economy has started bouncing back, with the job market slowly opening up and companies no longer showing the exit door to employees, Bangaloreans are cautious while spending.

“Bangalore has been severely hit by recession. But things have started improving. Lay-offs seems to have stopped,” Karthik Shekhar, general secretary of UNITES Professionals India, told IANS.

“However, it will take some time for the economy to fully recover. Once that happens, people are sure to open up their purses again,” he added.

According to UNITES Professionals, a union of employees in the ITES sector, around 50,000 techies in India lost jobs during September 2008-October 2009.

Bangalore was the worst hit in job losses as 40 percent of Indian IT and business process outsourcing (BPO) professionals work in the city.

Moreover, 80 percent of IT and BPO professionals in Bangalore have seen a cut in their pay packages and perks post-recession.

Over half a million people are employed in the IT industry across Karnataka spanning software services and IT-enabled services, including BPO and call centres.

As India’s tech hub, Bangalore accounts for about 450,000 jobs, with 300,000 in software services and the remaining (150,000) in back-office operations.

“Recession has taught me a good lesson. Save for bad times. Thankfully, I did not lose my job whereas so many of my friends were shown the door. These days I think twice before spending. I don’t spend unnecessarily,” said Apurva Agarwala, a software engineer.

Shweta Misra, another IT professional, said now she saves half her salary.

“I no more splurge. I make a budget for the month and make a good saving every month to tackle any situation,” she said with a smile.

Source : http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Recession_makes_Bangaloreans_cautious_shoppers-nid-63952.html/1/1

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Will the recession fuel an outsourcing boom?

December 7th, 2009

Many Organisations throughout the Gulf Co-operation Council region, both public and private sectors, have developed their business models based on a very large component of relatively inexpensive expatriate labour. With the significant economic development of India and other countries, which have typically supplied labour to the region and the consequent increase in cost, these traditional business models are being challenged. Competition from all sources is also a significant factor.

Clearly, with the economic downturn/recession, a great deal of focus has been placed on operating costs and the staff costs component thereof. This must mean that “outsourcing” is an option that business leaders in the region must consider. Let us, first of all though, discuss what is outsourcing and what sort of benefits can be derived from engaging in this.

Outsourcing – the delivery of a business process or function for an organisation by a third party – has been with us for decades. In the 1980s major IT outsourcing deals were developed, with global suppliers like EDS and IBM leading the way. In the 1990s Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), covering functions such as finance and HR, was pioneered by major professional firms such as Accenture and PwC. And in the last decade the reach of outsourcing spread up the value chain to encompass functions which might once have been considered “core” to the organisations now employing third parties to carry them out, for example, complex accounting, analytics, and research & development.

What drove this boom? Originally the key driver was probably philosophical – “stick to the knitting” and outsource everything else was the mantra of many a business guru. Then the trend was helped by advances in technology and the deregulation of telecommunications which enabled effective access to remote sites. Even more importantly was the trend of globalisation, which brought the concept of receiving services from India, Eastern Europe or China mainstream.

But every outsourcing decision is, at heart, business case-driven. Can the outsourcer deliver what I want more cost-effectively than I can do it myself? Whether this is through shared centres, economies of scale, technology or labour arbitrage, this is the key driver behind all the myriad decisions to outsource taken in the Board Rooms of the world.

Given this, isn’t outsourcing the answer to the problems faced by organisations in the current downturn – if you can’t grow your top line, then what is left but to cut your bottom line to maintain margins? And outsourcing should be able to deliver that.

Well, up to a point.

Outsourcing can certainly reduce costs, and very dramatically. Our experience is that for labour-based activities which are moved offshore (say finance processing or computer programming) savings of 30%-40% of the in-house cost in the US or Europe typically achieved. The costs will be delivered through a combination of labour arbitrage, process improvement, economies of scale and technology.

So why isn’t everyone outsourcing now?

Because outsourcing, done properly, costs money up front. The 30%-40% savings which grab the headlines are based on annual steady-state run-rate – they are real, but are not typically year 1 savings. Indeed, payback is usually around 1-2 years for a major outsource deal.

There are several main reasons. The first is that outsourcing deals are complex and require specialist commercial and legal input to make sure they are properly structured and will deliver sustainable value. This takes time and money – it typically takes 6-9 months for a client to complete the process of selecting a supplier and contracting for the outsourced service.

The second main reason is that it requires significant change to deliver the savings, and the project to deliver that change costs money. Even if a function is being moved offshore “as-is” (known in the industry as “lift and shift”) there is still a major project required to set up the delivery centre (outsourcing suppliers don’t have empty offices and spare staff hanging around), documenting the function, and transferring the knowledge. Suppliers will charge for this project, and there will also be project management costs on the client side. The suppliers’ charges may be spread over the life of the deal, but they are still a cost.

Lastly, redundancy – typically the biggest single item. As jobs are offshored or re-engineered, so the people go, and in many countries that can be expensive.

So does all this mean that outsourcing really isn’t a key tool to fight the recession? Well it wasn’t a panacea in the early days of the downturn when immediate cost saving was the focus for panic-stricken organisations. But now that the dust has settled, and organisations are looking for cost-effective delivery models for the medium term, they are likely to turn increasingly to the proven benefits of outsourcing.

This is as relevant in the Gulf as it is elsewhere. Access to skilled resources, state-of-the-art centres and leading edge technology is something organisations in the region all need, and outsourcing – whether onshore or offshore – can deliver them.

Source: http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=330365&version=1&template_id=48&parent_id=28

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Turn the Recession Into a Marketing Opportunity

November 28th, 2009

Have you noticed how quickly so-called “business leaders” can turn into wimps? They strut their stuff when the economy is booming, making it clear their success is of their own making. But when things turn sour, they run for cover, blaming company failures on circumstances beyond their control. Out of desperation, they lay off workers, cut benefits and slash budgets – including marketing. Not every company capitulates in the face of an economic storm. Take, for example, Wal-Mart, Hewlett-Packard, Proctor & Gamble and Apple. All have one thing in common: They are excellent, unrelenting marketers – and they lead the competition in their categories. In other words, they refuse to hunker down.

It isn’t just big companies, either. There’s Florida-based Optimal Manufacturing Engineering. It’s a small firm that beats the competition by telling its story of offering better solutions faster and at a lower cost with its 24/7 outsourcing engineering services.

Here are steps companies can take to make sure they continue to thrive:

1. View your business as a marketing organization. Whatever else this recession may prove, it will dramatize the difference between companies that see themselves as marketing organizations and those that don’t.

Two retailers make the point. One is a somewhat upscale men and women’s shop in Newport, R.I., where the experienced owner takes a personal interest in serviceing his customers. Unfortunately, he does no marketing. Although there are twicea-year sales, they aren’t promoted. As might be expected, same-month revenues have plummeted compared with previous years.

Then there is the upscale women’s clothing shop in Hingham, Mass. The owner, a marketing-driven retailer, constantly gathers contact information, including e-mail addresses, from her customers and keeps them informed by e-mail and direct mail. She didn’t just start when economic conditions changed. This shop is busy.

One sells clothes and the other creates customers.

In the same way, the owner of regional business reported that sales for a group of peer operators in his industry were down 10%, but his company was up 1 .3%. That spread is no accident, since he maintains a consistent, effective marketing effort, year in and year out.

2. Give customers a reason to buy from you. By the time the public had a good look at the presidents of GM, Ford and Chrysler, only one company came through with a positive image: Ford. While the other two presidents whined, pleaded and characterized their companies as on life support, Ford said its company was sound, had financial reserves, didn’t need a government loan and had significant plans to increase vehicle fuel efficiency and to speed production of electric cars.

Chrysler and GM viewed Congress as their “customers,” while Ford looked beyond the hearings, recognizing it had an opportunity to communicate directly with the public. They know what their customers want, and they are prepared to deliver the right results. Ford stood out from the competition and gave consumers a reason to put a Ford in their future. This is exactly what customers are looking for from every business.

If they don’t have a reason to buy that makes sense, they won’t.

3. Don’t try to outsmart customers. It’s now clear that last November’s “Black Friday” was really “Bleak Friday.” Customers actually “raided” retailers, cleaning out the lowest-priced merchandise and then going home – not to return. The next day, Saturday, was a disaster, indicating that the big shopping was finished.

Macy’s, the nation’s department-store behemoth, flooded its customers with email and direct mail with all types of dollar-off cards and coupons. Its print and TV ads told the same story. Yet, the cards and coupons were fraught with many exceptions. It was clear Macy’s was doing a con job on its customers. It sent a powerful message: “You can’t trust us. All we want is to get you in the door, and maybe you’ll buy something.”

4. Think inside the box. Innovative thinking isn’t about something new and clever that has everyone saying, “Oh, yeah!” Sure, there are few “wow” moments, but to spend time looking for them is to miss what’s right in front of us.

When a San Diego high school calculus teacher had his supplies budget cut, he thought inside the box. With so many quizzes, he uses a lof of paper. To pay for producing his tests, he contacted businesses that might be interested in a one-line sponsorship at the bottom of a test. He needed only about $300, but is on course to collect about $1,000, which he’s using to help colleagues with their supplies.

5. Build customer relationships. An interesting offer of a free report came from a well-known research firm. The subject, “Consumer Interests Drive E-Mcril Opens,” was of interest, so I filled out the e-mail form and downloaded the document. In less than four hours, the phone rang. It was a telemarketer from the research firm. In that instant, the picture became clear. The report was simply a gimmick, a hook to sell something.

A far more productive marketing strategy, for example, is the Wharton School’s “Knowledge@Wharton” eBulletins that contain valuable information. On occasion, Wharton presents opportunities to purchase books and other materials, but it creates so much credibility by sharing knowledge that selling presents no conflict.

Whether business buyers or consumers, everyone wants to be treated with respect, and that comes from being offered value. Everyone talks about building customer relationships, but few are serious about doing it.

6. Have the right marketing message and suck with it. The most efficient way to kill marketing is to put it in the hands of salespeople. Their rightful interest is in the next sale, not in the next customer. Their job is to see the trees, while marketers see the forest filled with customers who can become prospects for the sales force.

This is why companies with a sales mindset tend to falter and even fail in a recession: They run out of leads because they have never made a consistent effort to cultivate customers.

Not so with Wal-Mart. Its fortunes are soaring, while its peer group is not doing nearly as weil. Wal-Mart sends customers a consistent, clear message, one that resonates with stressed, cash- short customers: “Save money. Live better.”

In effect, this is the Wal-Mart customer commitment, and it offers far more than just lower prices and a cash-register receipt. Wal-Mart promises its customers what they really want when they spend their money – the possibility of a better life. That’s what Wal-Mart is selling. And behind its growth is a marketing strategy that attracts and holds customers.

These six concepts lead to one conclusion: While most companies hunker down to ride out the storm, others see an opportunity to build market share. Ironically, it’s much easier to gain attention and make your case with customers while competitors sleep. When the storm inevitably passes, those that market will be ahead of the pack.

What does all this mean? In a February 6, 2008, BNET article, lake Swearingen tells of a conversation with Dr. Gary Lilien of Penn State’s Smeal College of Business about marketing in a recession. Lilien s study showed that those companies that market have an advantage. He said, “Companies that have been looking at marketing as an investment, and not an expense, and have been running their business through customer knowledge are the ones that are going to come out of this [recession] really, really well.”

Source:http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/yb/138339981

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes