Posts Tagged ‘US’

Outsourcers warn US producing too few engineers

September 2nd, 2010

US universities are producing too few engineers to meet industry demand, Indian outsourcing companies say, leaving such businesses little choice but to hire foreign skilled workers to fill jobs in America

US universities are producing too few engineers to meet industry demand, Indian outsourcing companies say, leaving such businesses little choice but to hire foreign skilled workers to fill jobs in America

If you look at the core of what we do, the technology work, the US simply doesn’t have the talent base today,” said Francisco d’Souza, Cognizant president and chief executive. “Although unemployment in the US today is high, IT unemployment is still very low.” The US last month passed a border security law that will be partly funded by doubling the cost of visas for IT workers, a move that will mostly affect Indian outsourcing companies.

Indian outsourcing companies usually keep a small portion of their workforce in the US to work closely with clients, supported by the bulk of their staff in development centres in India.But the protectionism move – a senator who sponsored the legislation described Indian outsourcing companies as “chop shops”, a reference to garages that dismantle and sell stolen cars – may have little impact.

About 70 per cent of US PhD students are foreign born and are often hired in the US, making their way into Silicon Valley or government agencies such as Nasa, said Partha Iyengar, of Gartner, the consultancy. The bigger challenge for the US is, if they start to lose this talent at the lower end, the innovation engine that has been driving the economy starts to dry up,” Mr Iyengar said.

India’s undergraduate university courses produce about 600,000 engineers a year compared with about 84,000 in the US in the 2007-08 academic year, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.Mr d’Souza says about 20 per cent of Cognizant’s workforce of 88,700 work in the US and of those more than half are Indians or foreign nationals in the process of becoming permanent residents.

Gopalakrishnan, chief executive of Infosys Technologies, India’s second-largest IT company, said the group had 10,000 staff in the US but only 1,600 were nationals or permanent residents. The company wanted to hire 1,000 people a year in the US but faced a scarcity of talent. “It is a struggle,” he said.Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Source:-http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/607d4946-b5f1-11df-a048-00144feabdc0.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Outsourcing to the US?

August 19th, 2010

Could jobs that were once outsourced to India come back to the US? It seems that could happen.

Pramod Bhasin, CEO of Indian outsourcing giant Genpact , said he will move jobs to America because high US unemployment is pushing wage rates below that of what he’s having to pay in India.

To unemployed Americans, the announcement may be welcome news. But Ron Shah of Geena Ventures, an India-centric private equity firm, is concerned. The jobs being sent back to America, he said, are low skill and pay around minimum wage. Meanwhile, the US continues to outsource high margin, high intellectual property work to places like India, where a technology-friendly base has been built.

These jobs are being sent back to America for cost advantage, so there will be no sustainable boost to US employment, Shah argued. Historically, high margin work has been the strength of the US economy, he said. High margin work has been America’s “bread and butter” and Shah has “issues” with those jobs being exported.

Steve Cortes of Veracruz said the announcement is a “testimony to the efficacy of free markets that the rising tide lifts all boats.” This first helped American shareholders, he said, because companies were able to outsource jobs to more cost efficient places, like India. As a result, India’s middle class grows and that increases demand for the amount of American products that can be exported there, he said.

Legendary hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller threw in the towel Wednesday. He said he was discouraged by his returns in the last few years, where he had averaged 30% in annual returns since 1986. But if Druckenmiller stopped playing stock-picker, should you?

Guy Adami, managing director at Drakon Capital, said a lot of hedge funds have become too big. When they have that kind of capital under management, it’s too difficult to make returns. He thinks there are plenty of smaller money managers who do well.

Being “small and nimble” is helpful, said Steve Cortes of Veracruz. He finds a lot of opportunities overnight. Large hedge funds wouldn’t be able to squeeze through because there is not enough liquidity at that time, but smaller traders can get it done, he said.

Joe Terranova, chief market strategist at Vitrus Investment Partners, said he tries to identify tailwinds.

Pete Najarian, co-founder of optionMONSTER.com, said he’s found luck in the long-term. He sells upside calls and brings in the premium. Collecting premium and collecting dividends is what has worked for him.

One way to potentially make money is to short, so where do you start? We spoke with Eric Jackson, founder of Ironfire Capital, who provided a list of names he loves to short.

EAR TO THE WALL: RIMM

From conflicts to foreign governments to confusion over price cuts of its new Torch smartphone, the headlines haven’t helped shares of Research In Motion . The BlackBerry maker’s stock is down by 12% this month.

Consumers, not businesses, now make up two-thirds of RIMM’s subscribers, said CNBC’s Jon Fortt. The company has struggled to generate excitement amongst their base, he said. The Torch, for example, sold 150,000 units over the first few days of its release. Apple’s iPhone, however, moved 1.7 million units in the first three days, including pre-orders.

Joe Terranova, chief market strategist at Vitrus Investment Partners, said he would buy RIMM at $45-55 a share on the basis that it might be acquired. Asked if Microsoft might want to purchase RIMM, Fortt said that would be the “worst buy in the world.” RIMM has a $30 billion market cap, so why would MSFT pay that amount to acquire a company that performs the same services it already has.

Fortt thinks Nokia , however, is an interesting guess on who might takeover RIMM. He said the two companies have roughly the same market cap and strong personalities at the helm, so he’d wonder who’s in control. Nokia is great at phone services and RIMM offers top e-mail services, so the companies could use each other, he said.

Source:http://www.cnbc.com/id/38759781

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

US action will singe IT firms

August 15th, 2010

Even as United States president Barack Obama hails India on her 63rd independence anniversary, the new Border Security Act, which raises visa fees substantially, is expected to cost information technology (IT) outsourcing firms in India a whopping $200 million (Rs930 crore) a year.
The US has increased skilled work visa charges by nearly $2,000 (Rs93,000) per person per year. There are 70,000-1,00,000 Indians in the US, nearly all of them IT professionals, working on three-seven year visas, who will be impacted by the change.
The move is targeted at bridging the cost difference between employing an Indian technology worker and a local worker. Indian and international IT firms prefer hiring Indian workers over locals as they are paid $60,000-$80,000 a year, making them around 20% cheaper than Americans.
Killing two birds with one stone, the Emergency Border Security Supplemental Appropriations Act — the bill passed by the Senate on Thursday and signed by Obama on Friday — seeks to channel the extra visa revenues into sealing of the US border with Mexico.
With elections to the Senate and House of Representatives due in three months, feelings have been running high about the influx of illegal immigrants from Mexico.
Indian industry has criticised linking the two distinct issues. “While the need to secure greater funding for strengthened security along the US-Mexico border is understandable, illegal immigration issues are not linked to the temporary movement of skilled professionals,” protested Chandrajit Banerjee, director-general of the Confederation of Indian Industry.
“We have been made a scapegoat,” said Som Mittal, president of Nasscom. “Instead of catching illegal immigrants who break the law, you are trying to tax people who have followed the law.”
According to the US government, around 15 million Americans (10% of the workforce) are looking for work. “Unemployment is largely in manufacturing, construction, and retail. We fail to see how they are related to skilled worker visas,” Mittal added.
As per the act, firms with more than 50% local employees will be exempt from the new charges. Thus, outsourcing giants such as IBM and Accenture, which compete with Indian firms for most contracts, can continue to send Indian workers to the US under the old charges as they also have many local workers there.
However, for Indian biggies like Infosys and TCS, who between them have around 25,000 Indian workers in the US, the 50% mark is a long way off. It is estimated that local residents make up only around 15% of their US deployed staff.
For now, no one expects the extra expense to dent the India advantage of outsourcing giants like Infosys. But the IT industry is definitely worried that Obama’s election rhetoric “Buffalo-not-Bangalore” has started becoming laws. “Our objection is not so much on the costs, but on the principle,” says Mittal of Nasscom.

Source:-http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_us-action-will-singe-it-firms_1423527

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

US imposes extra charges of $2,000 per annum for skilled workers from India

August 14th, 2010

The Indian IT outsourcing firms have been saddled with combined costs of around $200 million (Rs930 crore) a year, after the US increased skilled-work-visa charges by nearly $2,000 (Rs93,000) perperson per year. There are an estimated 70,000-1,00,000 Indians in the US, nearly all of them IT professionals, working on 3-7 year visas in the US who will be impacted by the change.

The move, part of the election-fuelled anti-foreigner frenzy, is targeted at bridging the cost difference between employing an Indian technology worker and a local worker. According to opponents of outsourcing.Indian workers have traditionally been preferred over locals by both Indian and international IT firms as they are paid in the range of $60,000 to $80,000 a year, allegedly making them around 20% cheaper than Americans.

Killing two birds with one stone, Emergency Border Security Supplemental Appropriations Act — the bill passed by the Senate on Thursday, seeks to channel the extra visa revenues into sealing of the US’ border with Mexico. With just three months remaining for the US Senate and House of Representatives election, feelings have been running high about the influx of illegal immigrants from Mexico through the porous border between the two countries.

Late April, the US border state of Arizona had enacted a stringent anti-trafficking law that gave wide ranging powers to the local police to detain foreign looking people unless they carried immigration papers. The law, compared by critics to Nazi regulations, also made a crime not to carry such papers. Many US citizens accuse illegal immigrants from Mexico — many of whom are trafficked across the border by gangs of outlaws — of lowering their standards of living by working for peanuts after crossing over.

The Indian industry vehemently criticised the linking of issuing perfectly legal, temporary work visas to highly skilled engineers to the emotive issue of illegal trafficking of labour. “While the need to secure greater funding for strengthened security along the US-Mexico border is well understandable, illegal immigration issues are not linked to the temporary movement of skilled professionals,” protested Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry, India’s biggest industry representative body.

The IT industry, which will be the hardest hit by the new provisions, called it discriminatory and misguided. “We have been made a scapegoat,” said Som Mittal, president of Nasscom, the industry body that represents the interests of Indian IT and outsourcing firms. “Instead of catching illegal immigrants who break the law, you are trying to tax people who have followed the law,” he pointed out.

He said that Indian engineers are not to be blamed for the record unemployment rates in the US today. According to the US government, around 15 million Americans (10% of the workforce) is currently looking for work. “The unemployment is largely in sectors like manufacturing, construction, and retail. We fail to see how they are related to skilled worker visas,” Mittal added.

Interestingly, the new visa charges will not hit all Indian IT professionals, but only those that are sent by India-based companies such as Infosys, TCS, Cognizant etc. According to the bill, to be signed into law by US president Barack Obama, all firms that have more than 50% of their employees hired from the US will be exempt from the new charge. As a result, international outsourcing giants such as IBM and Accenture, which compete with Indian firms for most contracts, can continue to send their Indian workers to the US under the old charges as they also have a large number of local workers in the US.

However, for biggies like Infosys and TCS, who are expected to have around 25,000 Indian workers in the US between them, the 50% mark is a long way off. It is estimated that local residents make up only around 15% of their US deployed staff, though both have plans to add hundreds of US-based workers to their rolls.

“Yes, it is discriminatory,” said Kris Gopalakrishnan, chief executive officer (CEO) of Infosys, “It is targeted at one sector, one industry and one country,” he said.

While the Indian government has already written to its US counterpart protesting the move, some feel that Indian firms must do more to counter the ‘election propaganda’ including a recent comment by a US Senator that Indian companies were ‘chop shops’ or illegal tear-down yards for stolen vehicles. “Senator Schumer’s comment shows that in an election year, he is “standing up” for American jobs,” warned John McCarthy, principal analyst for Forrester Research based in Massachusetts, USA, as the bill was being debated.

“But that said, as we head into the midterm elections with 9.5% unemployment and very little job growth, there will be more comments like this unfortunately, and the Indian firms and Nasscom need to be prepared with their own PR counterattack and story,” he added.

For now, no one expects the extra expense to dent the India advantage of outsourcing giants like Infosys, which is expected to see its visa costs to double from around $15 million (Rs72 crore) to around $30 million (Rs145 crore) on an annual revenue of around Rs25,000 crore. The industry, however, is definitely worried that the rhetoric, which started with ‘Buffalo, not Bangalore’ election slogan by Obama two years ago, has started impacting law making. “Our objection is not so much on the costs, but on the principle,” says Mittal of Nasscom.

He pointed out that many American companies derive large amounts of profit from the Indian market. “There are tens of thousands of Americans working in India.. If protectionism continues, the government of India would also be obligated to respond,” he said.

Source:http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_us-imposes-extra-charges-of-2000-per-year-for-skilled-workers-from-india_1423032

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

India Inc not worried over latest US outsourcing rhetoric

August 11th, 2010

Indian industry seems sanguine on the latest bit of political rhetoric from the US on the outsourcing of work and jobs from there, culminating in a reported statement from President Barack Obama on the process being reversed.

On the heels of a leading US Senator describing Infosys as a ‘chop shop’ for American jobs, news agencies had quoted Obama at a party fund-raising programme as saying the jobs and industries of the future weren’t going to Germany or China or India, but would be back with America.

Taken with earlier comments on the need to act against the outsourcing of processes and jobs to places such as India, some read it as another whetting of the sword against Indian benefits from the process — our Rs 2.3-lakh crore information technology industry, for instance, earns more than 60 per cent of its annual business from the US.

Add the fact that the US economy is still in slowdown mode and that it is going to face a rancorous mid-term election in months.

Nevertheless, Indian industry feels the US president has not issued any red signal on the march of our IT industry.

“President Obama has made a good statement about the US competing with India and China and to create jobs in the US. He wants made-in-US to dominate and this is about manufacturing, not outsourcing,” said Som Mittal, president of Nasscom, the apex IT industry association.

Ganesh Natarajan, former chairman of Nasscom and chief executive officer of Zensar Technologies, said the remarks are more of rhetoric, with mid-term elections round the corner.

“As an industry, we are watchful about any policy changes. But these comments seem more directional in nature. I do not think the US government can act on these statements,” he said.

Nishant Verma, managing director of Tholons Capital, which advises Indian companies on outsourcing, said the commercial motivation to send these (US) jobs to other regions remains and will continue.

Agreeing, a senior executive from ABC Consultants noted numerous US companies have back-office operations in Indian cities such as Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore, Chennai and Hyderabad. These companies have not only made significant investments in India but are also looking at increasing their staff here, he said. “Before the US takes any step in this regard, it will have to think hard about (the effect on) its own corporate world.”

And, experts with the pharmaceutical industry said the US would not be able to bring its healthcare costs down without the help of Indian generic companies, which contribute over 40 per cent of generic drug needs in the US.

“US drug multinationals are closing their manufacturing facilities and moving production to countries like India to save costs. It is not viable for US drug corporations to create manufacturing units in the US,” said Ajit Kamath, chairman and managing director of Arch Pharmalabs, a major supplier of active ingredients to US drug companies.

“The US would imperil itself by blocking movement of talent to its shores. More than hurting the Indian firms, this will hurt the US multi-nationals: the US would lose the advantage of being a country where free movement of expertise happens,” said K Pandia Rajan, founder of Ma Foi Management Consultants.

There is a big issue, noted many, on the availability of skills within the US and its utilisation. One sequel has been the surge in the Indian population working in the US, from 1.6 million in 2000 to 2.5 million in 2007, making it the fastest growing ethnic group there. The point is that this is also one with among the highest proportion of educational qualifications and skills.

Quite a few say one should appreciate the Obama administration’s stress on making the US more competitive by focusing on education and trying to create skilled jobs. And, that it is well aware of the pitfalls in blocking the movement of skills and expertise.

Source:http://sify.com/finance/india-inc-not-worried-over-latest-us-outsourcing-rhetoric-news-technology-kilcbhaaaai.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Indian outsourcing industry hits out at US visa bill

August 11th, 2010

India’s flagship outsourcing industry has slammed a US bill that could double the cost of a work visa in a move targeting high-profile Indian software exporters.

The measure would boost annual US visa costs for India?s outsourcing industry by 200-250 million dollars annually, the National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) warned.

S. Gopalakrishnan, chief executive of India’s second-largest outsourcer Infosys Technologies, told reporters late Monday he was “saddened and disheartened” by the step and said the sector would lobby strongly against it.

India, which already holds at least 50 percent of the global outsourcing market, has become the world’s back office where Western firms set up call centres, number-crunching and software development outlets to cut costs.

But the 50-billion-dollar industry also sends skilled workers to the United States to develop software and direct projects for US clients.

The visa legislation, sponsored by two Democratic senators and passed unanimously by the Senate last week, still needs to be approved by the US House of Representatives and signed into law by President Barack Obama.

The row has erupted as India gets ready to host Obama later this year.

With anti-outsourcing anger stoked by high US unemployment, critics denounce the Indian firms as “body shops” because they provide Indian professionals to US companies rather than employing Americans.

“We think it (the bill) goes against the notion of free trade and is discriminatory,” India’s third-largest outsourcer, Wipro, said in a statement.

The measure would raise by 2,000 dollars per application the US fee paid by any company with more than 50 people in which over half the workforce has H-1B and L-1 visas earmarked for skilled foreign workers, industry officials say.

The current visa fee is 2,500 dollars.

The proposal is to use proceeds from the fee hike to pay for the US government’s plans to boost security along its border with Mexico to help crack down on illegal immigration and drug smuggling.

“While we understand the need for heightened border security, we believe the extra fees will produce negative consequences for both US and Indian companies,” said NASSCOM president Som Mittal.

Sponsors of the bill on a Senate website said the legislation would hike fees on particular Indian companies — including Wipro, Infosys, Tata and Satyam — which they accuse of seeking to “exploit” the two categories of visas to “import foreign workers into the United States.”

Indian IT firms fly thousands of employees each year to the United States to work at their clients’ locations as on-site technicians and engineers in what critics claim is a violation of the “spirit” of US immigration law.

US high-tech firms such as Microsoft, which bring skilled immigrants into the United States on the same visas, would not be hit by the bill as the vast majority of their workforce is composed of Americans.

“US companies, which use the bulk of these visas, would remain unaffected by the legislation,” NASSCOM’s Mittal said. “This is simply unfair to foreign companies.”

Source:http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jG_9uMkiR7-EjYtaj_7NTUP69rGQ

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Infosys CEO sees U.S. visa costs passed to customers

August 10th, 2010

Infosys Technologies said the cost from U.S. plans to hike visa application fees on some technology firms operating in the United States would over time be passed on to customers as it was an industrywide issue.

The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote on Tuesday on border security legislation, which also significantly raises visa application fees on a select group of companies that operate in the United States, including Infosys.

Infosys Technologies chief executive Senapathy Gopalakrishnan told reporters late Monday that the new fees would however in the immediate future have a minimal impact on India’s second largest outsourcer.

Indian outsourcing companies have come under recent criticism from some U.S. politicians who say they add to unemployment in the United States by outsourcing jobs to foreign workers.

“What happens over time is that this (visa cost) is transferred to customers because this is industrywide. It will be built into the cost,” Gopalakrishnan said.

He said that in the short term, the cost of new visa regulations would be approximately $4 million to $6 million as it would affect 2,000-3,000 Infosys employees.

The beefed-up U.S. border security measures were approved by the Senate last week and the sponsor, New York Democrat Charles Schumer, said that the bill was also targeted at a select group of companies that “exploit” U.S. law to import workers from abroad.

Senate aides said this would affect four companies from India that operate in the United States: Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro and Mahindra Satyam.

Gopalakrishan said he felt “sad and disheartened” by the move, but said the company needed to better educate skeptics.

He said he believed the Indian government was putting pressure to find a solution to this.

“We hope the government will continue to support us.”

Source:http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6790DW20100810?type=politicsNews

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Identi.ca
  • Hyves
  • IndianPad
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Post to Twitter

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes